The Public Forum of The M+G+R Foundation
The purpose of this Public Forum is to publicly respond to
that we may receive from time to time and which is of Universal
in these very unsettling times.
We reserve the right to choose what questions to address and how to
transcribe the question and/or statement from the correspondence
The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential except in
case of abusive correspondence which will then be referred to the
Letters/Questions - Addressed on May
- June 2005
June 29th, 2005 - Feast of Sts. Peter and Paul]
I went to Mass Saturday evening for the Vigil for Sunday. I was
watching carefully to be sure that all the vessels on the altar
containing the bread and wine to be offered were beneath the
priest's hands as he performed the Transubstantiation..
I believe I saw that after Father transubstantiated the bread and wine
in the vessels before him Deacon P went into the (place where the
Blessed Sacrament reposes-also a pass-through to the preparation area
behind the altar), remove two gold bowls and placed them among the
others on the altar. The contents were then part of what was offered to
those receiving The Holy Eucharist.
My question is this:
Does the bread remain in the "Form" (of Our Lord) even though it may be
unused for a particular Mass and brought out at a later time or
need it be transubstantiated for each Mass?
Yes. The Eucharistic Presence of Our Lord continues to Be. However,
there seems to be a problem with that practice.
First of all - In accordance to the
Vatican Rules, most of the consecrated hosts given in a particular Mass
should have been consecrated in that same Mass, except when conditions
simply prevent it, such as: Mass in St. Peter's Square or the esplanade
before the Basilica of Fátima and the like. Even though
thousands of hosts are consecrated then, the officiating minister must
rely on previously consecrated hosts for the communion of
hundreds of thousands of communicants.
Nevertheless, what concerns us the most is that we are witnessing the
practice that you have reported in far too many Masses where there is no need to do so
unless, of course, "the need" is to feed the Faithful unconsecrated
host. This, of course, would be in keeping with the times that we
are living through. What better way for satan to mount a full and final
assault on those who try to remain strengthened by and through the
Bread of Heaven than by spiritual starving them?
Most homilies have become completely
; therefore, if to that absence you add the withholding
of the True Bread of Heaven... then, what is that you have left?
Nothing! - excpet the ever-present collection plate.
Our advice from here - and regardless who may get upset, the Roman
Curia included - is: (1) Attend Mass where you can be sure that the
consecration is being done
; and (2) That most hosts used in
communion were consecrated right at that Mass and before you own eyes.
Frankly - with some notable exceptions - we have very little trust in
the integrity of those who
today claim to be Shepherds for God's
. As the saying goes in the U.S. - we must all act as if we
June 24th, 2005 - Feast of the Birth of John the Baptist]
believe there may be an error in Volume II (Lenten Season), Page 976,
in Second Reading in a Treatise by St. Basil. In the last
sentence of this reading the last words read "---we become God".
This troubles me as I believe this is New Age philosophy.
From The M+G+R Foundation
@ European Union & USA
June 11th, 2005]
I realize that we are created in the image of God and also become
Christ-like, but NEVER GOD. To my knowledge there is only one
God, my Father and Creator, and Him alone do I serve, not serve myself.
I e-mail one popular Catholic ministry who has a Bible Institute only
to be told that I took this out of context. How do you take
something out of context when they capitalized the word "God"?
Only God Himself receives that honor and right.
If you believe this is in error, could you please direct me as to
how to have it corrected. I have heard this kind of teaching in
our local church and feel extremely uncomfortable about it.
Error? It is Blasphemy! Who Is Like Unto God? You
have every reason to feel uncomfortable about it. It is not of God.
We have have just published an eight page
document addressing this and
other related issues which continue to erode the little Faith left
while opening the doors for the
manifestation of the
June 21st, 2005]
reference to the "Man vs Man"
article posted on 6-11-05 - it
appears more than coincidence, and more of a phenomenon of
synchronicity in my case that just last week I started to read an
old book of mine left unread for years that deals with the topic:
-It is entitled
" The Fingerprint of God" by Hugh Ross.
-The book was published by Promise Publishing
Company, Orange, CA 92667 first edition in 1989.
-Hugh Ross is an astronomer who details the
scientific discoveries that support creation and "reveals the
of the Creator".
-To me it is the best book written for the lay
reader like me about connecting science and faith via cosmology with
-If you can obtain the book it is a must read,
that I highly recommend.
Thank you for considering my message.
We have heard of that book as well as about Dr. Ross,
thus we are glad to post the above report for the other visitors to The
M+G+R Foundation Domains.
For a series of unusual current Geophysical and Astronomical events
taking place in our world and its surroundings Click Here. God
to give His children signs. Unfortunately, it is usually too late
we realize it and act upon
June 17th, 2005]
Q. Dear Sirs:
Recently I examined the several articles listed in EWTN's Documents
Listing concerning various subjects re: Opus Dei.
Each one supports the successes as Opus Dei has risen in the Hierarchy
of the Roman Catholic Church and glows with seeming self-satisfaction.
I must admit I find it discouraging that "no ear seems to hear nor
tongue to speak" that there may be an undercurrent of motive deeper
unformed Catholic may see or understand.
We received your communication as a notice from God to
speak about that subject matter at once without further delay - and
that we will.
miguel de Portugal, before and after "he was", was a strong
of EWTN, by word, T-shirt wearing and
financially. He corresponded with Mother
Angelica frequently, received everything they published, secured
video tapes of key special programs and showed them to others, promoted
them within whatever Catholic Community he was associated with at the
Through a series of highly unprobable circumstances - also known as
Divine Providence - m de P was given a solid gold rosary by the most
unlikely benefactor (that story, in itself is most interesting). The
immediate thought and action
was to send it to M. Angelica for her nuns to utilize it when praying
in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament - he certainly did not need a
solid gold rosary to pray with! It was graciously received by Mother
Angelica and, as such, acknowledged.
He drove to the original EWTN location to visit it and the monastery,
attended Holy Mass, prayed the Holy Rosary, etc.. He "felt" that all
was good indeed (Incidentally, in the same trip he visited Caritas of
Birmingham and he "felt" that is was bad - Caritas NOT Medjugorje)
Back in Nazaré, Portugal, he wrote Mother Angelica
asking/discusssing with her why they were not broadcasting radio and/or
TV worldwide - that he felt that it was sorely needed. M. Angelica
wrote back saying that she wished to do so but did not have the means.
We then agreed on "Oremus..." for it.
During these few years of bliss between m de P and EWTN, one Holy Week
Mother Angelica wrote (no form letters) to let him know that the nuns
were be praying specifically for him and the work he was conducting for
the Glory of God, before the Blessed Sacrament during the Easter
By this time m de P was noticing something amiss with
H.H. John Paul II
pastoral trips turned into media jamborees as well as with
Movement of Priests.
His relationship with M. Angelica was such that he wrote to her
confiding his concerns to her - especially about the papal media
jamborees. Never, ever heard form her or EWTN again. Not even received
the automatically addressed monthly newsletters. It was the END
of "the Christian love affair".
Shortly thereafter money "appeared" for world wide TV and radio
transmission of EWTN programs and for a new monastery. She seems
to have been shipped away with her nuns to said monastery to keep her
disconnected from the ministry that lived on because her but was no
longer hers - just like the fate suffered by
H.H. John Paul II.
Dear brother, you seem to have Eyes to See and Ears to Hear
ability to discern how the
wool is being pulled over the eyes of "the unformed Catholics".
June 13th, 2005 - Our Lady of the Blessed Sacrament]
Q. I went to
a funeral of a friend that was in the Episcopal Church. This was
my first time.
I was surprised to see how their celebration look so much like
our Mass. They even had some of the same prayers and songs.
The most touching moment to me was when the pastor invited all to
What he said was, "All are welcomed to receive. They only
requirement is Baptism." It truly made me see how arrogant the
Catholic Church is to deny anyone communion. Here it was offered
to me in a different church and I was struck with the feeling/knowledge
that my Lord was present to me in another place of worship.
This is truly a terrible time in the earth when men of the church
believe they can deny Christ to the people. Christ comes to us
It is indeed a terrible time in the earth and that is
precisely while God will have to directly intervene as He did during
Mary came a number of times to make up for the deficiencies in the
Evangelization of the Church Her Son established. Her messages were
ignored. God allowed the
bloodiest century in the history of mankind -
the 20th Century - in the hopes that the pain was enough so that the
"deaf would hear" and He would not have to increase it further.
He was mocked and continues to be mocked by what we now call - The
Vatican Circus. Logically, this time, the "volume" will be higher
the pain will be global and
far greater than in the 20th Century.
Regarding the statement made by the Episcopal
priest officiating the funeral you attended to, we have to make a
As we pointed out in our
document dealing with this particular issue,
the key condition to partake of the Holy Eucharist, in addition of having been
Baptized a Christian is: For
the individual to be truly
repentant from his/her sins and truly want to change his/her life, yet,
is weak, therefore, is having difficulty breaking away, and
staying free, from the yoke of satan.
The one event that would decelerate the
descent of the world into the abyss, would be to nourish the searching
souls with the bread of Heaven - the Most Holy Eucharist. Yet,
this Divine and Healing Bread Form Heaven is being denied by the Church
Administrators on grounds which are not Scriptural - for He came to
heal the sick not those who are well.
In this time of International Courts of Laws
bringing current and former government officials to justice for having
committed genocide (*)
and fanning the flames of hate, were there enough time left, we would
call for an International Tribunal to try the
Administration of the
Roman Catholic Church - NOT the Catholic Faith, but
Administrators, past and present - for Crimes Against Humanity, with a
spiritual component, the unjustified withholding of the only
Supernatural remedy to the misery of man - the Bread From Heaven.
Unfortunately (yes, we said "unfortunately") for them there is not
enough time left and the level of Justice that will be dispensed by God
upon them for their betrayal, will far surpass anything that man could
(*) According to Webster Dictionary: Genocide
is the deliberate and systematic
destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group
Q. On the June 7th posting at our Points to Ponder
section we posed the following question:
ever wonder... why a lay man, who has done in a
limited scale the same thing that priests that have done
in a grand scale (with their superiors covering up for them) gets a
life sentence and most guilty priests, Bishops and Cardinals get
with it? etc.
An individual who received a mailing from us containing
pretty much the same question, and who is well qualified to answer it,
was kind enough to do so. We secured said individual's permission to
reproduce the letter while keeping it completely anonymous as to not
interfere with said individual's work in the area in question (*).
Those who commit pedophile
acts on children and who are not in the clergy get jail time. Priests
who do the same, do not,
generally speaking, get jail time. The reason is that
the lawyers and parents of the children, threaten the archdioceses to
file criminal charges, but in exchange for not suing,
they agree to settle for big big money. This way the state attorney's
around the country never see the case and a criminal
complaint is never filed. In effect, we have thousands of pedophile
who do not have to wear ankle bracelets, or are listed on
sexual predator lists. Other non-clergy pedophiles have to do these
things. Archdioceses keep their pedophile priests hidden in
the church doing archdiocese jobs; just not doing masses. They are
moved around, rent is paid, pension, etc. Money has
bought the pedophile priests a haven. But whose money has bought them
this haven or refuge? OURS!
Sad times for our Church. What is really frustrating is
that we are blind. We sit in the pews and we do not know what is going
and the effect it has on all the world. By the way, I would
suggest everyone seeing the movie "Our Father" with Ellen Burstyn.
only the tip of the iceberg has been touched. The gay underground
clergy, active homosexuals, have the Church
in the palm of their
hand. They know who we are, but we do not know who they are. We
are a Church within a Church.
Then there is the sordid stories of the seminaries and the
raping, drugging of seminarians by other seminarians and vocation
directors. Miami is another Sodom. So are many other
dioceses. Most are gay friendly and none of the priests will come
because they are afraid. Where is Mother Church? We are
underground already, but we have no walls. They are invisible.
Pray, Pray and Pray. I pray for the illumination because I
cannot stand knowing what I know. God Bless
us and have mercy on our
church. God open our eyes!
only removed a four word sentence as not to give a clue as to the
gender of the writer.
What can we add to that other than to
ask each one of you to please
pray for this individual and others in the same painful situation ("I
cannot stand knowing what I know") - whether clergy or laity.
are the ones who are truly part of the remnant - they have Eyes to See
Ears to Hear.
June 9th, 2005 - Mary, Mother of Grace]
Q. The following websites seem to be linked to your
posting on oxytocin and seem to tie in in with New World Religions.
Again it seems that some of the groups are
"hiding" right in front of us.
Hope these may be of some use.
Yours in Christ.
[JH is referring to
the posting date June 4th in our News Commentary
section entitled: "Trust me! I am a hormone" -- A
hormone that makes people trust you..]
First of all, Thank you! for a very valuable contribution
We have visited the sites mentioned in your letter The
Hedonistic Imperative -
Heaven on Earth? and The
Oxytocin Garden of Eden. Your evaluation is right,
right. "They" have already reached the "working" level of even
substituting the fulfillment of the First and Second Commandments,
feeling of Love for God and each other, a Love that only God can bestow
on us, with a drug
This is not just a "foot print" of the False Christ in the
making, it has its "fingerprints": The falsification of a condition
only naturally attainable through God.
Indeed it is an
integral part of the False Dawn
which Lee Penn
just exposed to the world
in minute detail - Thanks be to God!
You obviously have Eyes to See. We pray to
God that our brethren out there now fully understand the imperative need to seek
those Eyes to See - something that truly God is the Only One Who can
grant. Drugs cannot induce that.
We also pray to God that every
one who sees this posting shares it far and wide because this is
already taking place with other perception altering drugs and
psyco-techniques - it
is most evident in the political arena. So
evident, yet unseen, that it always surprises us when we see proof of
it although we are fully aware of it.
We take this opportunity to recommend to our readers to review the
exposé of the fabled New Age that we
published some time ago.
June 3, 2005 - Feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus]
"Do you ever
wonder... why people choose to deny the undeniable? Because "Knowledge" is not only "Power" but it is
also "Responsibility" . Unfortunately for many, "looking the other way" or "hoping that it goes
away" will not, we repeat, will not be acceptable
by God as a reason for inaction and/or disobedience to the entreats of
God, through the Virgin Mary, to
come back to the Gospel....."
Which of course is where my head is at, and where I struggle with my
own questionable actions and 'morality'.
I also have to confess that I find it..... unsettling..... that
I have a reasonable amount of contact with a guy (you) who claims he
talks to God more regularly than anyone else has before, so why do I
have that contact, to what purpose. Plenty of people out there claiming
the same thing, but for some reason I listen to you. And why are my
views of any interest to you. All thought provoking stuff.
So, thank you for your response
A. Part I
The moment one recognizes that one's actions are of
questionable morality and is searching for a solution - there is no
denial. Denial is either wanting to be blind to a situation; or
justifying the morality of what an action which is clearly not. You do
not "qualify" as being in denial - on the contrary.
Who did Jesus talk with? Who had access to Him? Those the Father chose.
If it was "good enough" for Jesus" it certainly will be "good enough"
for miguel de Portugal who is not even fit to untie His sandal strap.
When man tries his best to serve God, then it must be always God's
choice and not man's
as it usually
is under the guise of being God's Will. You have not experienced (yet?)
the situation when God says "Enough!" direct contact. When He does,
is shut down. You are right - technically there are over 6 billion of
you out there and all are children of God - the ONLY Creator.
Why are your views and comments of interest to us to the point of
frequently publishing them? Quite simple! They are of universal nature
- hundreds of millions of our brethren face the same confusing
those who are searching,
have the same questions
and concerns. Thus our
comments are for all.
We pray that we have "provoked enough constructive
thought" to all!
Australia [Published on
June 1, 2005]
Q. Hello, fellow brother in Christ!
Notwithstanding Church protocols in these matters, do you believe
Pope John Paul 11 is a saint?
God bless you and your labours,
@ Ireland [Published on May 27, 2005]
Q. Thank you for your the swift
reply on your website to my query in relation to John Paul II, last
pope of the present era, etc. Having read your response to several
e-mails on The M+G+R Foundation Public Forum, it would seem that John
Paul II was not pope when he died.
God has therefore decided to remove this 'position' from human
hands, therefore Benedict XVI is historically an elected pope by the
College of Cardinals but not chosen by God as a successor of
Peter. Correct me if I'm mistaken about the above, it certainly
is difficult to fully comprehend the nature of events that have
transpired, as always of course I pray that God blesses you in your
May you continue to do God's Will,
@ USA [Published on May 24, 2005]
Q. Are there any prophesies for
the year 2005 for the world and for the United States?
A. If we knew something specific - we would not
announce it, as we have stated elsewhere. Why? The complete answer is
quite complex and beyond the comprehension of most - just as is the interaction between Time
However, a more practical answer may be found in why should man not
know, with precision, what the future has reserved for him. As we
pointed out in Divination
Healings ...But, What About God? utilizing the First Book of
It is not the Will of God that mankind know such information unless He
Will specifically that some particular individual(s) do so to be used
in accordance to His Plan and for His Honor and Glory. We have
learned that lesson the hard
Even miguel de Portugal prays as follows: "Lord, I do not need to know dates or
specifics of events, unless it is your Will that I do. What I want is
to get accomplished all that You want me to get accomplished in the
manner, order and timetable that You Will it to be."
This should be a prayer of all mankind so that it
prepares itself for
We have repeatedly stressed the importance of being
in tune with the Holy Spirit of God and be ready as the five wise
virgins of Jesus' parable. As the world sinks in the darkness and deceit, only the
"silent" prompting of the Holy Ghost will be our safe and secure
"Navigator" until the End of These Times.
Mexico [Published on May 24, 2005]
Q. While reading the document "On
Defense of His Holiness John Paul II" a question arose in my mind. Is
The Neocatechumenal Way something wrong within our Catholic Faith?
This question is very important to me since I have a very good friend,
who is a priest, and who has been part of said movement for many years.
A number of times he has insisted that my wife and I join the movement.
I have never felt comfortable with it. Nothing that he tells me about
it "clicks right" within me - I do not know exactly what it is but that
"feeling that is right" is absent.
A. We have repeatedly stressed the importance of being
in tune with the Holy Spirit of God more than with any one individual
movement. As the world sinks in the darkness and deceit, only the
"silent" prompting of the Holy Ghost will be our safe and secure
"Navigator" until the End of These Times.
Obviously your "Navigator" is working quite well. There is only one way -
the Way of Jesus Christ as set forth in the Holy Scriptures - Old and
New Testament. We do not not need Escriva's Way, we do not
Way, we do not need the
Legionnaires of Christ's Way, we do not need the Marian
of Priests' Way, nor any and all
other Ways who try to preempt the
only one way - Jesus
H.H. John Paul II, may his soul rest in peace, was tricked into
approving movements about which he obviously knew very little and now
we are beginning to see the sad and destructive fall out as they all
try to Save the World and the Church to the exclusion of others.
We will soon write extensively about the pathetic show that is being
staged at The Vatican now while the different sects allowed, by
default, by John Paul II try to carve out a piece of the "Holy Pie".
May God have Mercy on
- we assure you - they
will need it!
Mr. A, we thank you for this fine opportunity that you have given us to
address this very critical issue. May God continue to Bless you with
the Guiding Light of His Holy Spirit.
[Published on May 20, 2005]
Q. Please correct me if I am
wrong. Did I not read in your domain somewhere that you
recommended the film "Jesus" a lions gate film to be the most
biblically accurate? I've been searching and cannot find the
recommendation. Well, to get to the point, I watched the first 15
min. of it and had to turn it off, as I got ill watching Jesus and Mary
(Martha's sister flirting with each other). Then to make matters
worse Mary Magdalene is shown nude getting out of bed as I watched with
my 6 year old son. I had to turn it off. Please tell me
your site is not the one that suggested that film.
One more question please. If Miguel de Portugal thinks Mel
Gibson's "The Passion" is based on fanaticism then he must think that
St. Anne Catherine Emmerich's book is based on the same? Just
From a catholic that has seen what has happened to the church and
attends mass or mess on Sunday only to pray silently through the whole
thing and make reparation for the disrespect shown our Lord during mass
A. First of all - Thank you for writing and giving us
the opportunity to clarify some points. Yes, we have recommended such
film but the recommendation seems to have been made to a limited
audience. Obviously we were not clear enough about certain aspects of
the film, which we will now attempt to correct.
(a) The film is not
the most biblically accurate film on the life of Jesus - it is the one
that better portrays the real Jesus. The most biblically accurate
film on Jesus is the one which Campus Crusade has had translated into
many languages and shown to hundreds of millions of viewers. The Campus
Crusade film adheres to the Gospel according to Luke as close as it is
(b) Jesus was a human in
all but sin. We did not see as offensive the alleged flirting of
Jesus with Mary (Martha's sister). Jesus, in His humanity, could have
very well been attracted to Martha's sister - that is not a sin,
otherwise God would not have made humans to naturally respond that way.
What may be a sin is how a man or woman respond to that natural human and not non sinful trait.
Neither Martha's sister nor Jesus acted in manner that would even come
close to sinfulness. On the contrary - if there was such a normal
attraction between them - their choices to not follow through Glorified
(c) The Mary Mary Magdalene scene - we would have toned it down a bit.
It was necessary to get across well her sinful way of life but it could
have certainly been toned down. However, being unexpectedly thrust upon
such scene - which by today's world standards it is not too off color for most 6 year old children - could have been used as a good
Evangelization opportunity which would have left a positive impression
in the child. God is indeed more powerful that evil but we have to
bring Him in.
Having said all of that and acknowledging the rough edges of the scene
- spiritually and psychologically speaking, said scene was a drop of
water when compared to the bucket full of water characterized by the
sadomasochistic orgy staged by Mel Gibson in his film.
(d) Regarding Anne Catherine Emmerich "vision" or
"illumination" about the Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ (or any
similar individual experiences) - we discourage focusing upon such
documents/books/revelations since, because human nature response, they
will cause such revelations to pre-empt the Holy Scriptures. On the
other hand - we encourage writings like those of St. Faustina and St.
Gertrude from which much can be learned of the relationship God would
like to have with each one of His children but, generally, do not
pre-empt the Holy Scriptures.
We Praise God that you are among "...a catholic that has seen what has
happened to the church and attends mass or mess on Sunday only to pray
silently through the whole thing and make reparation for the disrespect
shown our Lord during mass or mess." If more of the Faithful
would have done so, the suffering that awaits humanity would have been
reduced even further. Please encourage everyone to do the same as you
do, and we encourage you to specifically offer the suffering you
experience when witnessing such disrespect and chaos as an act of
consolation to Our Lord and Our Lady - They greatly appreciate this.
(*) The Jesus Film is a major motion
picture of the life of Christ based on the Gospel of Luke. Campus
Crusade has made the Film available to more than 180 new mission
agencies (in addition to the more than 400 already using it), and it
continues to be one of the key ingredients of Campus Crusade's New Life
2000 ecumenical world evangelization campaign. Since Campus Crusade
claims The Jesus Film has been viewed by more than 710 million people,
in 220 countries, in 340 languages, with 41 million "making decisions
for Christ" (as of 6/96), its accurateness in doctrine and style must
be a major concern to all Bible-believing Christians.
From R & K
[Published on May 12, 2005]
Q. Thank you for all of your
recent writings and messages to share with all the wandering/wondering
souls. Many times I do not have the enlightenment to appreciate
all that you say and share. Other times, the "light bulb" goes
on. That is okay with me. You told me not to pray for
anything more, spiritually, than God has in
store for me right now, and I have decided to accept that. I will
continue to read, and to say my small prayers through it all. I
just have to trust that, when the time is right, I will be able to
fulfill what the Lord wants of me.
I have decided to quit watching most of the news shows that I used to
watch. I try to read the paper with discernment, and ask the Holy
Spirit to guide me to the stories that might be of significance.
I don't want to be in denial, nor do I want to be spoon-fed a bunch of
nonsense. I am not sure which is right...I just don't have much
taste for the cable/network news any longer. I think it
concentrates too much on fluff stories, while there is so much more to
be concerned about that it almost appears to be an intentional
A. There are two issues of universal interest in the
above communication that we wish to address:
(a) You state: "You told me not to pray for anything
more, spiritually, than God has in
store for me right now, and I have decided to accept that."
We are pleased to hear that. That is
exactly what miguel de Portugal does - in spite of the tremendous
amount of information that God deems to transmit to him on an almost
ongoing basis. miguel takes such position to the extreme of praying
thus: "Lord, I do not need to know
dates or specifics of events, unless it is your Will that I do. What I
want is to get accomplished all that You want me to get accomplished in
the manner, order and timetable that You Will it to be."
That is a daily and heartfelt prayer; after all, who needs to care
about anything else if each one of us strive to allow Him to freely
work through each one of us?
"I have decided to quit watching most of the news shows..."
we also strongly recommend to everyone and something that m de Portugal
also practices even though he now has 24 hr access to the key cable
news - US and European - plus the Internet, of course. For the same
reasons you state plus others
as may be read in the Board
and News Commentary
postings of May
12th. To those reasons one may add the subliminal brainwashing
ongoing via certain television stations/programs.
This is not
denial; on the
contrary - this is acknowledging, accepting and working within the
reality that we are living through today.
From "Kirk" @
[Published on May 9, 2005]
Regarding our choice of utilizing "Kirk's" letter in a recent document,
as part of his response authorizing us to utilize it in full he wrote:
Q. It amazes me that your
perception of my letter was as such... I still struggle with the
"Why Me?" at times... and this is certainly one of those times.
A. First of all,
said document has had
tremendous circulation and most constructive
feedback. So much so that yet another document was born
Regarding the "Why Me?" syndrome... The "Why Me?" syndrome is "a plant"
from satan to lead man to undervalue himself as a tool for God.
Another manifestation of this "plant" we have lifted from a recent
letter that will be published at a letter time: "I felt I should be praying for the
world and the conversion of sinners – myself included . A grandiose intention – who am
I that my prayer could do much?"
It IS God Who decides all of this and the Only One Who grants the
requests. The only "Who is..." question that is truly valid would be: "Who is man to question the Divine
Did God need the Army Corps of Engineers to part the Red Sea? No. It
took only one man, who God chose "just because" and who, as an act of
his free will, chose to respond to God's call.
It is that simple? Who is miguel de Portugal ? The same story -
and you (and 99.99999% of those who have heard of m de P) do not have
the slightest idea of how, and for what, God has used m de P to change
in this world
- which is what we keep referring to as "the main function of m de P".
Just relax and enjoy every time that God chooses to utilize you. Just
make sure that it is Him and not satan playing a trick through
your ego. All of us, m de P included, are exposed to that threat
- but true humility will protect us from such snare.
From JM @ USA
[Published on May 2, 2005]
Q. This past April 11, I had a dream
that actually felt like a visit from Pope John Paul II.
was very sad and looked so tired. He was in my home, I don't know how
he got there and he sat down and told me there are 2 kinds of people in
the world - those who believed what he taught and those that
didn't. He emphasized to never stop believing his teachings on Jesus
and our Blessed Mother.
A. The above
posting is not the norm for our Public Forum but because circumstances
about which LM knew nothing about, the timing of receipt of the above
communication and the fact that, if it had been miguel de Portugal
instead of H.H. John Paul II who had appeared to LM after his death,
the statement would have been exactly the same, we chose to publish it.
He was so sad that so many people didn't
believe. "They will not have the faith to survive the anti-christ". He
said death followed him wherever he went and was so tired of having to
avoid it. He was so sad about those who are going to be lost forever
and he thanked me for praying for him and asked me to thank everyone
for their prayers.
He also wanted me thank those who believed in
his mission. Finally he told me to follow Jesus to Calvary and not to
lose hope. He said that at calvary the effects of original sin are put
to death and we are free.
Among the teachings of H.H. John Paul II was the tremendous importance
of praying the Rosary.
From Various @
[Published on April 30, 2005]
following is a "composite question" from several recent
e-contacts with The M+G+R Foundation regarding Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger's election at the final conclave..
You said that he was the last
legitimate pope of our time. How would that tie in with Benedict XVI?
There is no doubt that Satan has infiltrated the hearts and minds of a
great many people in the Church, including those given the great
responsibility of governing it. But this man like you have said after
your trip to the Vatican was selected 'by the active will of
God', so this would surely indicate that he is a legitimate successor
to John Paul II.
A. We understand
that many issues are hard to understand/comprehend. We strongly suggest
that the moment anyone encounters such difficulty, even after seeking
the Illumination of the Holy Spirit of God, it would be best to "drop
it" and focus your attention on prayer and acts of reparation.
In accordance to what you wrote, is Joseph Ratzinger an impostor?
Could our new Pope be a False Prophet, elected to the throne by the
Studying what you wrote about the active and passive Will of God, it
would seem to me that the Active Will of God wills for what is
perfect. God would not will for a pope who is not the true
successor of Peter, or who is the “antichrist”- WOULD HE? Jesus
did not will for Judas to betray Him.
I would feel better if on some points that did not turn out to be
exactly as you claimed they would be, according to you private
revelation, you would acknowledge you were mistaken. Somehow I
don't think that will happen because I see many times that you explain
it by saying that you already knew it and God used it to show
The fact that in the last election the Active Will of God was
fulfilled, does not make either Cardinal Ratzinger a bad or
undesirable man nor it takes away the reality that Karol Wojtyla was
originally elected as the last Pope.
About this we will only clarify as follows: As we have have stated
elsewhere openly or hinted through the usage of veiled terminology -
Karol Wojtyla was elected as Pope John Paul II, however, that does not mean that
when he died he was still the Pope.
Man cannot supersede God's Will by performing this or that prescribed
ritual. God always
has the Last Word and when men
abuse His Goodness He
will do whatever is necessary to protect His children and confound the
enemy. As we have pointed out before - towards the end of the Papal
sequence, there was going to be one last true successor of Peter and
more historical Pope.
Jesus Christ - as God and as man - through His Active Will appointed
Judas Iscariot as an Apostle, even though He knew that Judas was going
to betray Him.
As an act of charity, we will comment upon the outright accusation that
if miguel de Portugal were to make a mistake (which he
does - after all, not even Peter was infallible all the time [Galatians 2: 11-21]) he
would not admit it.
One glaring example of the banality of such accusation may be found in
an official letter,
which was sent worldwide to scientific centers via
regular air mail, acknowledging having made a prediction without the
appropriate permission from God - a prediction which, of course was
wrong because there
was a change of plans.
God in His Merciful Goodness salvaged m de P's credibility before such
a large scientific forum through an
astronomical event that is described in the letter. That did not make
the error less
- it just made us better appreciate the Loyalty, Support and Mercy of
God toward those who leave a life, as few have ever experienced, to
follow Him - no questions
Lastly - we want everyone to keep very clear in mind a section from m
de P's brief biography:
Should you believe what miguel de
Portugal says through the pages of
The M+G+R Foundation?
You do not have to. What is
written is only for those
have eyes to see and have ears to hear. Woe to miguel if he does
loud and clear. Nothing has changed in the manner in which God has
with His children in the last 6,000 years.
Unless God Wills otherwise - we consider this case closed lest we fall
in an old and well used trap used by satan and which, through the Grace
of God, we have
learned to recognize soon.
If any questions and/or doubts remain,
please visit our Research
Forum - April 2005 - Edition Files
our Domain, just enter a key word/name into the box below and Click on
"Google Search". Google will then give you a listing of all the
in The M+G+R Foundation Domain which contain the chosen key word/name
Copyright 2005 by
Foundation. All rights reserved.
BOARD Listing the Latest Updates to this Domain
PAGE - English
PAGE - Español
PAGE - Portugues
If the above dated
does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the
original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to view
If you wish to contact The M+G+R
please Click Here and
You may freely reproduce and
this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as to its
(2) No changes are made in the text without prior written consent; and
(3) No charge is made for it.