We reserve the right to choose which communications will be
published and to edit them as necessary for clarity.
The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential unless
From (Mr.) IW @ US
Published on April 30th,
With reference to your recent (personal) communication....
Understood and agreed.
The virus itself (a mix of human, avian, and swine flu) is suspicious,
as is the earlier report of Baxter (2) "accidentally" putting
flu into some of its vaccines.
Additionally - I actually went through the flu pandemics of 1957
(as a toddler) and 1969 (as a teenager). Those pandemics are usually
listed along with 1918 as the flu pandemics of the 20th century.
I am sure that I got the flu during both epidemics, as I used to every
winter before 1987, when I began getting annual flu shots. The flu was
uncomfortable, and might have had me in bed for a few days, but it
never sent me to the hospital.
Nobody ever made the big noise about the 1968-69 pandemic that they are
doing about the current virus. Nor was it a matter of discussion in my
family - and my Dad was a pediatrician in a state health department. (I
followed the news then too, and so I would have remembered a big scare,
just as well as I remember the Chicago convention, the invasion of
Czechoslovakia, and the election of Nixon.)
It is very fishy indeed.
(1) The referred to communication (dated April 30th)
prophecy - just an impression after viewing several days worth of
snippets of news via France24, BBC, Sky News, CNN, and other European
Having lived long enough and through
a few very serious epidemics - even before they were controlled as they
are now - polio, for example. The concerted "let's panic" effort - accompanied by the "there
is no need to panic" talk -
that is being promoted by governments and the media smells like fish -
big and bad fish.
Mind you - when this situation
initially arose we had no suspicion whatsoever of foul play or mass
manipulation, however, the concerted methodology directed at "let's
panic" has raised a red flag for us.
(2) Published on
of the First
Friday of the Month]
Did you know that... live Avian Flu
virus was placed in Baxter vaccine materials and was
sent to 18 countries? (1)
The Deerfield, Illinois-based pharmaceutical company Baxter
International Inc. has just been caught shipping live avian flu viruses
mixed with vaccine material to medical distributors in 18 countries.
The "mistake" was discovered by the National Microbiology Laboratory in
Canada. The World Health Organization was alerted and panic spread
throughout the vaccine community as health experts asked the obvious
question: How could this have happened?
From JD @ Portugal
Published on April 29th,
Dear M de P
I call your attention to the following news report in
www.garabandal.us/workers.html because I think it is relevant.
A Message from
the workers of Our Lady of Mount Carmel
April 21, 2009
was with great sadness that we were informed late last night of the
death of Garabandal visionary Mari Loli Lafleur in Boston after a long
illness. She was very much loved by everyone involved in the promotion
of Garabandal. We ask your prayers for Mari Loli and her family and
Joey and Marilynn
From DLJ @ USA
Published on April 26th,
2008 [Feast of Mary, Mother of Good Counsel]
The Workers of Our Lady of Mt. Carmel de Garabandal
Lindenhurst NY USA
Peace to You miguel!
In reference to your mailing... (1)
We all know that
NOTHING will stop satan from trying! This does not amaze me. But, as
you have always said, those that have eyes that see and ears that
know where this is coming from.
Unfortunately, there are people we must
try to urgently reach to open their eyes and ears before it is too
I pray we ALL will do something to try. You, of course, take us
to the water, by example, and we must do the same. I promise to do the
God Bless you,
Mailing in question....
This is why we refuse to say anymore: "I've
seen it all!"
or "They just can't top this!" - we certainly do not want to
invoke the manifestation of yet another outrageous heresy.
Providentially we ran into the advertisement of this book: The
Virgin and the Priest by Mark Gibbs (a)
Our comments may be found after the quote.
For the first time ever
in print, The Virgin and The Priest unravels the Infancy
Narratives of the New Testament to reveal how they were compiled
protect the truth of Jesus' parentage from those deemed incapable of
An ancient formula,
explaining why "holy births" in the messianic lineage resulted from
questionable sexual relationships, was insinuated into the gospel
narratives. These trysts of the Old Testament heroes were necessary in
order to purify Jesus' ancestry and allow his genetic inheritance to be
"sinless." Far from advocating a miraculous birth, the New Testament
informs us that Zacharias, the priestly father of John the Baptist, was
Jesus' biological father.
This information is long
overdue but absolutely vital to understand the truth of what really
happened two thousand years ago:
• Jesus was the younger
brother of John the Baptist.
• A bitter sibling rivalry
was behind Jesus' failure to gain public acceptance - failure that led
to his execution and collapse of the messianic mission.
Although the Church
discarded the truth in favor of a theological construction, much of the
real story was always known to secret society elites, such as the
Knights Templar. However, they acknowledged John the Baptist, not
Jesus, as the true Christ.
This story of Jesus and
John the Baptist was crystallized in The Parable of The Prodigal Son
and documented in the Dead Sea Scrolls,..
The M+G+R Foundation Comments
1. If there is someone
walking on this Earth that can
categorically, and with absolute certainty, state that such claim is
the greatest perversion of the truth yet, is miguel de Portugal - and
he does! It even surpasses the alleged conspiratorial alliance between
Jesus and Judas Iscariot
2. The publication of the quoted book has forced our hand to speak
about the so frequently invoked Dead Sea Scrolls - statements which
have been in our proverbial "ink well" for one year.
We have had quite an interest in reviewing the newly acclaimed
"fountain of truth", yet did not know where to find a reliable source.
Providence led miguel to a book he did not know existed. The book
at a used book store in Florida [God does all He can to reduce our
Its title: "The Dead Sea Scrolls - A New Translation" by Messrs.
M. Wise, M., Abegg, Jr. and E. Cook., Published by HarperSan Francisco.
Copyright 1996, ISBN 0-0-069200-6 (cloth) and 0-0-069201-4 (pbk.)
book reproduced all the texts from the Dead Sea Scrolls which
had been translated as far as that year.
miguel literally "plowed" through such gift from Heaven to confirm what
he already new "otherwise": IT DOES NOT, in any way, invalidate
ANYTHING that we may find in a reasonable translation the Old and New
Testaments. What may appear different is so "off-the-wall" that it
falls to nearest land fill, so to speak, by its own dead weight. In
actuality, the contents of the Dead Sea Scrolls reinforces many key
items found in the Old and New Testament.
You know that we do not deny that there is other valid information
outside (but complementary) of the Holy Scriptures (b),
but we assure you that you can dispose of ANY claim which, invoking the
Dead Sea Scrolls, invalidate the underpinnings of Monotheistic Faith.
We ask you to share this information with as many individuals that you
can reach and we encourage the serious students of the Word of God to
locate the referenced book on the Dead Sea Scrolls and review it.
Grant it - it is "heavy reading", and, at times, plain boring, but for
the serious students of the Word of God it may be well worth the effort.
we will see, how long after this communication hits the "air
start hearing about "new and revealing translations" of the Dead Sea
Scrolls.... (with the intent to invalidate what we have written above)
- Thanks be to God we are used to that by now!
From WO - Published
on April 23rd, 2009
In reference to the Escriva statue formally
installed at the Vatican by Ratzinger (1)
, have you looked at it
Enlarge it (2)
look at the Latin inscription. It reads: Et ego, si exaltatus fuero
a terra, omnes traham ad meipsum.
Have you ever translated this/had
someone translate it for you?
I am a truly lousy linguist, I was curious about this. Interestingly, I
had trouble getting anything coherent out of the usual free online
translators. So, with what I gleaned from them, what I
remember of Latin, my trusty dictionary, this is what I came up
And I, if I be lifted
up from the earth, will
draw all things toward my purpose (or toward myself).
is beyond demonic. Now my use of syntax, proper cases/tenses may well
be slightly off - but no matter how you translate this (and
I spent a LOT of time on this!), it is not good. (3)
Though I never doubted the meaning/symbolism of this image of
Escriva at St. Peter's, in my mind this solidifies it all the more as
the fulfillment of the Abomination of Desolation
, referenced by
Daniel and Our Lord.
From WS - Published
on April 19th, 2009 [Mercy Sunday]
I saw a bumper sticker the
other day that read: "When
Jesus said love your enemies, he probably meant that you shouldn't
K-I-L-L them." How far we have veered from the narrow
I was struck as a kid when I saw a pack of Pall Mall cigarettes.
It had a the motto "In Hoc Signo Vinces!" Later in Latin class I
learned that meant "In this sign I will Conquer!" The shining
cross at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge, Constantine's Victory.
Little did I know the significance of that.
Taking history and religion in Catholic School we were taught of
knighthood and chivalry, Sir Galahad and the Holy Grail and of course
the Crusades. We seemed to be readied for battle against the
infidel ourselves. It was very romantic but not
compassionate. I confess a little admiration for Saladin (2) partly because he seemed the noble savage but mostly
because he beat the pants off the Crusaders.
I also remember joining the Sodality in eighth grade in a ceremony that
featured the hymn, "An army of youths fighting the battle of truth, we
are fighting for Christ the Lord..." Somehow all this made sense;
but there was a haunting sense deep inside that something was amiss
here. I don't remember the first Christians wielding swords in
the Coliseum. My recollection was of St. Peter being admonished
by Jesus for cutting off the ear of Pilate's man.
As a life-long Catholic what am I to make of my Church (2) It always seems to
be protecting its image instead of proclaiming the Good News. How
are we to follow the narrow path when it's deliberately being
hid. Obfuscation, double-speak, disinformation. Don't we
remember who was called the "Father of lies?"
Jesus said the truth will make us free. The truth needs no proof
or explanation. The "Truth" said "Give away all you have and come
(1) Salah ad-Din Yusuf ibn
Ayyub - a.k.a. Saladin
difference between what is promoted as the Catholic Church
and the beautiful reality of the Catholic Faith
From Mike Coppi (1)
on April 16th, 2009
In reference to The antiChrist Is Identified (2) ....
What's gotten into you these days, M de P (3)?
Taking some out-of-context (4) questions/comments by B16 that were probably
RHETORICALLY used and turning them against him?
Such fecal (5) 'announcements' will only serve to deter attention
from TRUE evil.
Let's consider a simplified example here........
A priest might start a homily by saying, "Why pray to God?", with the
intent, of course, to continue: "Because...".
But say a liberal reporter took just that first line, and then called
Oftentimes, posing a rhetorical question provides the best basis for a
lesson to follow.
Distorting 666 to 616 based on some obscure Codex? The Bible needs
Mike Coppi (7)
disclosure of sender in accordance to our policy as set forth in Reach
Identification of the AntiChrist
(3) Who is miguel
(4) Out of
to the dictionary definition: of,
pertaining to, or being feces.
(6) How to read and understand the Holy
Part I and Part II
(7) Prayers on Mr. Coppi's behalf are solicited.
on April 13th, 2009
I would guess you've already
seen news (1)
announcing that "Tony Blair tells the
Pope: you're wrong on homosexuality"
Mr. Blair is quoted saying “When
people quote the passages in Leviticus condemning homosexuality, I say
to them — if you read the whole of the Old Testament and took
everything that was there in a literal way, as being what God and
religion is about, you'd have some pretty tough policies across the
whole of the piece.”
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but when Jesus says "This is my body"
—speaking privately to his disciples in the same way he would speak
plainly to them whenever explaining parables, etc.— there is no other
way to interpret it than literally (2). Jesus always
explained everything to his disciples (especially when in private) so
they understood the truth.
However, after reading the above article about Tony Blair, I wonder how
long it will be before he suggests that the Catholic Church should also
remove the "hard belief" of transubstantiation (3) (ignoring John chapter
6... like the weak disciples who say "This is intolerable language. How
could anyone accept it?"), so that unity with other Christian faiths
becomes possible. It certainly would not surprise me.
A few items about Tony Blair that I find more than curious:
(a) He has been (put himself) at the
forefront of the push for peace in the middle east recently
His Faith Foundation seeks a global reformation of religious belief
(especially the Catholic Church, it seems)
He is now seeking the crown of the EU presidency
He certainly walks like a duck, and talks like a duck... (4)
May God continue to bless you and that you do!
(2) Biblical Literalism
- Part I and Part II
(3) Regarding the reality of
(4) Tony Blair - the latest
From m de P
@ EU - US
on April 12th, 2009 [Easter Sunday]
He was really resurrected
thus, we can rest assured that
all the promises He
made will indeed come true.
From m de P
@ EU - US
on April 9th through 11th, 2009 [Holy Week Triduum]
The best way to spend this
time - outside the scheduled Liturgies - is in prayerful meditation of The Stations of the Cross.
May God richly Bless your efforts to draw closer to Him.
m de P
From KD @
EU - USA
Published April 8th 2009 [Wednesday
of Holy Week]
My feelings are the same as those of IW
letter dated April
I'm eagerly anticipating what God has in store for us, and the sooner
we start, the better.
Like the published writer today, I hope that I'm not being foolish.
May God's Will (2)
Will of God
From miguel de Portugal @
EU - USA
Published April 5th 2009 [Palm
It not 5 AM Eastern Standard Time yet and President Obama has
finished a rousing speech to an adoring crowd in Prague. A speech
centered on the control and elimination of nuclear weapons on a
Acknowledging the fact that President Obama, in his innocence, really
believed what he stated, this is what we must
say as Divine Justice
demands we do:
1. The only way to successfully achieve
the, for example, prevention of a North Korea pursuing the development
of a nuclear force of deterrence can only be achieved by the
establishment of a New International World Order (1) where a central global
government could effectively
dictate and implement policy in any nation of the world.
We have seen that the most stringent slaps-on-the wrist by the UN
Security Council or even the US unilaterally do as much harm as a
toothless lion under heavy sedation. Anyone who doubts this should
count the US Presidents that the Castro regime has seen come and go and
how submissive Iran has been since it attacked the US Embassy in
Teheran decades ago.
2. The new steps to prevent nuclear material or other weapons of mass
into terrorist hands (2) will
have exactly the same effect that closing the barn door after all -
animals and barn, less the door - have been stolen.
3. We firmly believe in the applicability of "Yes, we can change!" but only for
short periods (unless, of course, God is involved in the process). We
now have nearly fourteen thousand years of confirmed recorded history (3) and man, without God,
is incapable of change. The best man can do is to pretend that he
changed while someone's heavy military boot is firmly resting on his
neck.... which brings us back to no. 1 above.
Yes, we would also like to believe in Santa Claus and the Three Wise
Kings bringing gifts while we sleep but, mercifully we know that such
fantasy is that - just a fantasy and that the only reality is God and
that the only way the world can place its house in order is by turning
to God. Mankind has had a chance to do so voluntarily since after the
time known as Noah's Flood (3)
, its leadership has been recently warned (4) about the
consequences of not doing so, but
failed again. Now man will turn to God otherwise (5)
will the establishment of the New International Order will be
merchant of death - The widespread availability of
I - Part
real time line of Creation
World - Warned Roman
method which just does not fail....
From TC @ USA
Published April 3rd, 2009
Peace in Christ!
Dear Miguel and all,
Please keep me in your prayers as I do All of you.
Thank you for the work you do striving to glorify Our Lord.
We also strive to run the good race doing the Will of God as best we
We trust in faith as we willing give over to God our prayers, thoughts,
efforts and deeds.
Trusting in his Mercy to lovingly receive these efforts of love
for Him in our daily lives.
As we pray for These Times, several times daily we visit your
pages as a valuable help in our day.
Yes, please keep me on your mailing list.
Please know that I pray for you at Eucharist often. Some days though I
I try to attend Mass daily.
I place you all in Mary's Immaculate Heart.
Let our souls magnify the Lord.
From MD @ USA
Published March 31st, 2009
It is interesting how the Benedict XVI functions...
According to the news report (1)
"Ever since he apparently misspoke
about the excommunication of Mexican lawmakers on a trip to Brazil in
2007, the Vatican asks reporters to submit questions in advance and
then makes a selection, giving Benedict time to prepare a response."
Considering that Jesus clearly instructed his followers to do just the
opposite through Luke chapter 12, verses 11 and 12:
"When they take you before synagogues and magistrates and authorities,
do not worry about how to defend yourselves or what to say, 12 because when the time comes, the Holy
Spirit will teach you what you should say."
Apparently, either the Benedict XVI is not familiar with these verses
(unlikely), or he is counting on reporters (and perhaps Catholics) not
being familiar with them.
Maybe this new tactic in dealing with reporters is a sort of
intended to protect him from bullets of another kind.
Thanks, as always!