The Public Forum of The M+G+R Foundation
The purpose of this Public Forum is to publicly respond to and/or
comment upon correspondence
that we may receive from time to time and which is of Universal
in these very unsettling times.
We reserve the right to choose what questions to address and how to
transcribe the question and/or statement from the correspondence
The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential except in
case of abusive correspondence which will then be referred to the
Letters/Questions - Addressed on April
@ USA [Published on April 26th - Mary, Mother of Good
pardon me here, however, I was reading a rather old (perhaps as much as
3-4 years) post of yours, titled, "It
Is Imperative that the Faithful Understand the Faith... To
Avoid Dangerous Doctrinal Errors".
Respectfully, it was my full understanding the church engaged in and
practiced pedastry (pederasty) in its early years, at the very least.
With regards to your aforementioned article, it would seem that
Catholic doctrine, at least pertaining to your quoted, No's 2389 on
Pedophelia, and, 2356 on Rape is in direct conflict with itself in
these early practices. However, given that the Church was
knowledgeable, some argue fully culpable, in sexual abuse cases of late
involving clergy, this would also seem to "fly in the face" of faith as
dictated by doctrine.
There is no doubt that some in Church hierarchy were aiding and
abetting this behavior in protecting and shuffling around guilty
How can this be?
perhaps was mislabeled by
using the word "Doctrine". Therefore, we have modified the title.
You are right - the Church Administration
has contradicted itself so many times that we almost feel embarrassed
pointing them out as the easy-to-spot contradictions come into our
scope. We have partially addressed this issue in our document
titled "...Do and
Observe... Whatsoever They Tell
You, But Do Not Follow Their Example, For
they preach but they do not practice.
As we have
said many times - they (the Church Administration) are not even good at
bad! [As the
American saying goes, spotting their
: "It's like shooting
fish in a barrel."]
Regarding the early record of their sexual misconduct, we invite you to
review two new documents we have recently published regarding the
Administration's past, and not so remote, moral record - The Truth About
and The Claim of
That is, we do not disagree with your understanding. As a matter of
fact, years ago we called to the attention of the key members of the
press - worldwide - Matthew Parris's book "The Great Unfrocked - Two
Thousand Years of Church Scandal"
so that they would
have a solid foundation upon which to report the current sexual abuses
within the Roman Catholic Church.
and your readers may recall a prediction on your site (not made by MGR)
from August of 2004, which declared that "the great miracle
announced in Garabandal will take place on Thursday, April
The individual who made this prediction was considered by some to
be "one of the world's foremost experts on Garabandal."
This goes to show that looking for specific dates leading up to
God's return is futile.
wonder what this is all about!!
New U.S. Embassy in Iraq cloaked
in mystery: New U.S. Embassy in Iraq cloaked in mystery. The
fortress-like compound in Baghdad will be the size of Vatican City,
with the population of a small town, its own defense force, and
self-contained power and water.
@ USA [Published on April 17th]
have read an article from a far right Roman Catholic Site whereby the
claim is made that Sister Lucía was switched around the Vatican
II time frame. The article ends thus:
"These are the comparisons I would like to offer to
my reader. My conclusion is simple: the face, the features, the
gestures, and the spirit of the two Sister Lucy's are dissimilar. It
would seem, then, that we are looking at two different persons.
If this is true, we
would have been duped by some impostor who was presented as the
authentic witness of the visions of Our Lady.
In this case, some
hypothetical questions arise. What happened to the true Sister Lucy?
When was the replacement made? And more importantly, why was such an
Perhaps if we ask
the classical question "Qui bono? [Who benefits?]" the answer
emerges. The retirement of Sister Lucy I and introduction of Sister
Lucy II before 1960, the year the secret was to have been revealed,
would prevent the true witness from telling the world the full content
of the Third Secret. This could only have been to the benefit of the
progressivist wing that is dominating the Church in our days."
The same web page advertises a book that is a blanket condemnation of
What is you reaction to this?
you for bringing this new aberration of the truth to our attention.
Fist of all, the author must have read what we published long ago
reference of the true Third Part of the Secret of Fátima and
drew his conclusions from there.
However, as we also pointed out, when the Vatican officially revealed
what they claim to be
the official Third Part of the Secret in May 13,
2000, what they revealed was diametrically opposed to what the real
Third Part was as we showed in the previously
The author must have also read where we reported that the "new and
improved" Vatican version of the Third Part was not even
by the same individual who penned all else before 1960.
All that was mixed in a bag, shaken well and the wrong conclusion
was drawn. If there was a switch, it was done to justify the take over
of the Vatican by extreme right elements of the Faith as we have also
@ USA [Published on April 17th]
you know where I can get , or do you have a booklet in english of the
novena to Maria Rosa Mystica that I can purchase?
If so can you help me get a copy of it? We need it for our
coronation ceremony in May.
We are not a commercial
organization, however, you may acquire the novena book through the 101
The Link is http://www.101foundation.com/item221.html
Many Blessings for your worthy intentions.
@ USA [Published on April 17th]
you for the opportunity to illustrate that extremism
is the same from
It is hard to tell whether you are pro homosexual or a homophobe. We
are neither, nor we play God.
miguel de Portugal only
speaks what God Wills he does.
When you see the "doomsday
scenarios" manifest themselves as we have
announced, you will also know that the rest is true too. Then, we will
welcome you back with open arms.
From miguel de Portugal
@ EU - USA
Published on April 13th - Last Supper and the Begin of Pesach -
of the Passover [Exodus 12: 1-14]
Note: It is the Will of God that we devote this very special
Holy Week to various Spiritual Exercises and Devotions, therefore,
there will be no further postings on this Public Forum nor mailings to
our Lists until after Easter Sunday, unless...
require it and Divine
Mercy demands it it. Nonetheless, we will strive to continue
posting the Divine
Instructions and Encouragement on a daily basis
throughout. May you and yours have a Blessed and Spiritually Fruitful
Holy Week. [Published on April 9th - Palm Sunday]
From miguel de Portugal
@ EU - USA [Published on April 7th]
most important Link in the story About
the Announced Nuking of Houston
Making of a "Patsy". Even the most incomprehensible events -
political and religious - which are leading the world to the End of
These Times could be better understood through such insight, yet a
scanty 7% of the readers of the main story made use of that Link.
I thank God that He
already prepared me
for this kind of
behavior/response fourteen years ago.
m de P
@ USA [Published on April 4th]
you for the story [About
the Announced Nuking of Houston]
, which I found very interesting.
I thought about the potential target of Houston or thereabouts.
If the case for nuking Iran is to be solid, then the attack on the US
must be plausibly directed against a worthy target. Were they to
hit Daytona Beach, for example, then aside from some lost tourism, the
US economy would not be hit, and we would be left questioning why they
would bother wasting their one nuke to hit something so relatively
you for writing which alerted us to clarify a point that may escape
most. In said document
"The US Faction of the Threesome
would never strike a city
the Industrial and Oil Refining importance of Houston has." The easy to overlook qualifier
is "the US Faction of
the Threesome". Of course, as you logically point out, the other two
factions would choose the Houston-Texas City-Galveston area precisely
for the reason of its strategic importance.
Mr. Welch's article was pointing the finger to the White House as the
conspirators which translates to "the US Faction"; thus our statement.
To avoid confusion we clarified it in the published document. Again,
@ USA [Published on April 3rd]
read a very interesting article today about the nuking of Houston
- Texas City area in Texas. I don't know what to think about it
considering the way the information is collected. You may
consider it interesting also.
have considered said article so serious that we have immediately issued
a document about it. Said document may be accessed by Clicking
Your spiritual alertness Glorifies God.
@ USA [Published on April 3rd]
do you think of this movie - Rape of
We have not seen it although we have briefly visited the Site.
Even if every allegation is true, that is not the way to solve
the problem. That movie will further harm the
As we have said over and over again, it is not the Faith; it is not
even the mentally imbalanced perpetrators of such heinous crimes; IT IS
Administration of the Roman Catholic Church who is at fault and the
one that should be dragged into the Tribunals until the last "moral
cent" is paid.
We must pray for the
good members of the clergy and Hierarchy who
are facing the titanic task of safeguarding what is left of the Faith
and the Faithful.
@ Europe - America
[Published on March 31th ]
Is it true what I have read about the connection between Secretary of
Defense Rumsfeld and Tamiflu Vaccine?
This question was posed to miguel de Portugal twice in a space of 24
hours by: (1) An important banker in Europe; and by (2) A top
government health official.
de P had no information whatsoever on the subject matter except having
been illuminated to see the parallel between the 2000 year "computer
bug", which was a carefully crafted hoax that filled the coffers or big
business, and the Avian Flu scare. After all, how can the much
mentioned Tamiflu vaccine work if the virus (the human-to-human
transmitted virus) does not exist yet?
Therefore, he has looked into the
information and this is what he found:
commentary by Dr. Joseph Mercola
fundamental issue is who owns the intellectual property rights
over Tamiflu. The media reports suggest that the Swiss
company Roche will make billions.
While the drug is produced
by Roche, it was developed by Gilead Sciences Inc. which owns the
intellectual property rights. Gilead, which has maintained a low
profile, has outsourced the production to Roche.
Rumsfeld was appointed Chairman of Gilead Sciences, Inc. in 1997, a
position which he held in the years prior to becoming Secretary of
Defense in the Bush administration. Rumsfeld had been on the
Directors from the establishment of Gilead in 1987.
As confirmed in a company press statement in 1997, Donald H.
Rumsfeld assumed the position of Chairman, of GILEAD: :
is fortunate to have had Don Rumsfeld as a stalwart board member since
the company's earliest days, and we are very pleased that he has
accepted the Chairmanship," Dr. Riordan said. "He has played an
important role in helping to build and steer the company. His broad
experience in leadership positions in both industry and government will
serve us well as Gilead continues to build its commercial presence."
to company statement: Gilead Science
Inc. "has been active in the development of inhibitors for the
potential treatment and prevention of viral influenza and protease
inhibitors for the potential treatment of HIV"
For the whole article Click
As an update, we quote from the Gilead Sciences
Announces First Quarter 2001 Financial Results
In January, Gilead
announced the appointment of James M. Denny to the
position of Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. Denny has been a
member of the Gilead Board since January 1996 and served as Chairman of
the Audit Committee. Mr.
Denny replaced Donald H. Rumsfeld, who
resigned from the Board to serve the Bush Administration as Secretary
of Defense. Last week, Gilead announced the appointment of
Hull to the Board of Directors and as Chairman of the Audit Committee.
He is the co-founder, Chairman and CEO of Infrastructure World, Inc., a
business-to-business portal for the global infrastructure community.
Mr. Hull also serves as a Director of Darby Overseas Investments, Ltd.,
Bechtel Group, Inc., Bechtel Enterprises and the Fremont Group.
A similar situation as that of Vice President Cheney and the main Iraq
Contractor, Halliburton. The question is, of course, how much stock
they own and how it is hidden from the prying eyes of the press and the
As the saying goes: "We rest our
case" since it is coherent with everything else.
Forum - March 2006 - Edition Files
Copyright 2006 by
Foundation. All rights reserved.
BOARD Listing the Latest Updates
to this Domain
PAGE - English
PAGE - Español
PAGE - Portugues
If the above dated
does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the
original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to view
If you wish to contact The M+G+R
please Click Here and
You may freely reproduce and
this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as to its
(2) No changes are made in the text without prior written consent; and
(3) No charge is made for it.