The purpose of this Public Forum is to publicly respond to and/or
comment upon correspondence that we may receive from time to time and
which is of Universal interest in these very unsettling times.
We reserve the right to choose what questions to address and how to
transcribe the question and/or statement from the correspondence
received. The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential
except in the case of abusive correspondence which will then be
referred to the appropriate responsible entities.
- The publication of Mother Teresa's
letters against her wishes
- Cardinal Bertone and the allegedly
original letter containing the Third Secret of Fatima
- The position of the Three Days of
Darkness in the "General Sequence of Events..."
- The doubting Thomases and the Warning
from St. Paul
- The reality of Pugatory - The
"restitution of debt" and the Mercy of God
- The meaning of "even satan must serve
God" at the coming of the False Christ
- Abraham's sacrifice as seen through the
eyes of his son Isaac
- The Triumph of Immaculate Heart of Mary
has not yet happened
- Connection between Opus Dei and
Protestants and other alliances
From LP @ USA -
on August 30th, 2007
In response to your communication (1) about
the publication of Mother Teresa's letters against her wishes...
The person in charge of Mother Teresa's sainthood cause
violated the Sister's express wish that her private letters be
destroyed. Instead, he and other Vatican officials flouted her
I do not know if anyone promised to her that the letters would be
destroyed; if so, the matter is worse yet.
For confession preparation, I use a set of questions from "A
Pocket Prayer Book for Orthodox Christians."
Several questions are immediately relevant to the conduct of
Vatican officials in this case:
- Regarding the 3rd Commandment: "Have
I entered into any unlawful contract or made an unlawful promise?"
- Regarding the 7th Commandment: "Have
I been unfaithful to any trust confided in me"?
- Regarding the 8th Commandment: "Have
I been honest and upright"?
- Regarding the 9th Commandment: "Have
I told any secrets
entrusted to me, or betrayed anyone? Have I gossiped about anyone or
harmed their reputation"?
For someone who is in charge of a canonization process, that's
quite a list of serious breaches of Commandments - and all (I suspect)
for some easy publicity.
A. This is reminiscent of what happened with the late John
Paul II private papers. He had asked that they be destroyed at
his death, but Archbishop Stanislaw Dswisz,
his personal secretary, violated John Paul's will and
kept them "for posterity" and as potential relics. Without a doubt they
will use them as a smoke screen to produce whatever document they wish
to produce "in his name" to advance the agenda (2) for the manifestation of
the False Christ.
It is all so transparent but they do not care - most of the Faithful
chose to be (3)
blind and deaf to the Truth for they have placed their Faith in men not
in God. (4)
Assuming these are real and the quotations are
proper context [both conditions are hard for m de P to accept,
certainly is in a position to make that judgment]....
We can sure count on the Vatican
- Mother Teresa had
wanted all her letters destroyed, but the
Vatican ordered they be preserved as potential relics of a
saint, a spokeswoman for Doubleday said. - to assist anyone who
wishes to destroy whatever little Faith is left.
(2) The Agenda for the
manifestation of the False Christ
Even if that was the case (potential relics) - Why are they being
published to a worldwide audience is she specifically requested they'd
grave sin of denial - its consequences
Foundation of Faith IS God
From TF @ USA -
on August 29th, 2007 [The
Beheading of John the Baptist]
It seems that the Vatican
is feeling the heat since Cardinal Bertone shows
original letter containing third secret of Fatima on TV:
Jun 4, 2007 / 11:17 am (CNA).- Vatican Secretary of State, Cardinal
Tarcisio Bertone, showed the original letter from Sister Lucia
containing the third secret of Fatima, which the Vatican revealed in
2000, for the first time on television.
A. Too little and too late. We
have had that
for about seven years. However, as the saying
goes: If a lie is repeated enough
times, most will believe it.
The real problem is not so much whether the third part of the Secret is
true or not. The real problem is that when Step No. 1 is
manifested. (and not symbolically this time) it will automatically
"prove" Fatima as a lie. We have also been announcing that
on-line since July 4th, 2000.
It seems hat Cardinal Bertone needs a Reality Check and we may just
comply with his silent request.
From MD @
US - Published
on August 25th, 2007 [Feast
of Mary, Health of the Sick]
I am a male in my early forties
married to a lovely woman with four beautiful children, living in the
SE of the US. I
have been Catholic all of my life, and I sincerely believe that your
efforts are a God-sent blessing to those who are struggling to follow
the real Jesus and His teachings in today's mixed up world --
especially given the state of our convoluted church.
so many misleading, confusing, and inconsistent so-called 'religious'
websites out there that do little to feed the soul, but do much to
fatten the mind. But every visit to your site always leaves me
enlightened, spiritually refreshed and informed.
you for all you are doing with your website... I visit it almost daily,
and always find your insight and analysis to be on-target, truthful and
--most of all-- inspiring.
Your site is truly like finding "manna" in this wasteland.
you may never know precisely the number of souls that have been (and
shall be) awakened by your simple presence on the internet... but you
can at least count me as one!
Please add me to you list, and may God continue to inspire and bless
you in your work.
A thankful sinner,
Thank you! As the saying goes: "We needed that!"
Your address has been added to our List.
Your closing statement
brought the following to mind:
hearing this, saith to them: They that are well have no need of a
physician, but they that are sick. For I came not to call the just, but
sinners. [Mark 2:17]
What deeply saddens us is that: Those who think that they do not need a
(spiritual) physician bring to mind those who have a terminal
disease.... they do not need one either. The rest of us - sinners - not
only need a physician, but we seek him! That is part
of God's Plan -
Please keep what we do
in fulfillment of the Will of God in your
From (Mrs.) MR @
US - Published
on August 22nd, 2007 [Feast of the Queenship of Mary]
How sad it is that you do not understand this movement we are called to
bring christ to others. I have been in the movement for 7 years.
I have five children no money and not a lot of time. I have been
blessed to see how God works. As catholics we are called to build each
other up not tear down.
Please pray about what you are doing to others by this negative web
Everything I read from you has somehow been twisted, possibly you just
had a misguided leader.
It would be like someone saying the church is bad because of some bad
things that had happened in the church.
I will pray that you can someday see the gift of this movement
and many others that are being raised up by the Holy Spirit in this
time in history.
We thank you for the opportunity to shed some light on the
matter as well as for your prayers.
We assume that you are referring to our position (1) regarding The Prelature
of the Holy Cross and Opus Dei. From your letter it is obvious
that you have not reviewed many of our documents which address the Opus
Dei (2), our
total support of the Catholic Faith (3), our position about the
Administrators of the Roman Catholic Church (3) and their trail of
destruction over centuries (4)
and how they have been summarily judged by Jesus Christ (5).
We recommend, for your sake, that you review those documents plus ask
yourself a few questions about your Faith (6) and who your leaders are
It may also be a good idea for you to understand who the Elect
are (8) and
how God has chosen them (9)
since the creation scenes in Book of Genesis through the final
cleansing found in the Book of Revelations.
In conclusion - what Escrivá seems to have tried to do was an
attempt to copy the work
of D. John Bosco (10)
in the hopes of receiving the accolades showered upon Don Bosco -
a man who had the doors of three Popes wide open for whenever he wanted
to "just drop by".
What Escriva failed to realize was that Don Bosco acted under direct
orders from Heaven and that cannot be falsified. With the Order
Don Bosco had established - the Salesians - there was no need for an
Opus Dei nor the other ecclesial movements which seem to have
multiplied as some sort of plague.
We wish upon you many Blessings and much Light from the Holy Spirit of
(1) The seriously flawed
Opus Dei "theology"
Index of documents relating to the Opus Dei
(3) Our total and
unquestionable endorsement of the Catholic Faith
position regarding the Roman Catholic Church Administration
Christ summarily judges
the Roman Catholic Church Administration
(6) The Only
Foundation of any Faith
(7)About the Keys of the
Questions that you must ask yourself
are the Elect
God chooses His Elect
(10) The trajectory of Don
From TJF @
US - Published
on August 20th, 2007
May the Peace of the Lord be
I see an inconsistency with the latest document (1) and the document "the
General Sequence of Events..." (2)
In the current document, you indicate that the False Christ will be
AFTER the three days of darkness. In the document entitled "General
Sequence..." it states:
Step No. 10 [The
period of the False Christ starts at this point]
The great tribulation - false
christs, false prophets, etc. [Daniel 12:11; Luke 21:8; 12-19; Matthew 24:22-26; Mark
13:15-22; Revelations 13:8-10, 19:11-19; 2Thessalonians 2:3-4, 8-12]
a. Persecution of the followers of the
true Christ will start with a vengeance. Worse than in the days of the
Roman persecutions and the Communist persecutions.
b. The manifestation of the "man of
iniquity" - the False Christ himself!
c. The persecution will be, if possible,
d. There will be fighting all over the
world with the small band of followers of the true Christ against the
forces of the False Christ.
When it appears that, once again, all is
lost for the disciples of the true Christ, then...
11 [This Step heralds the end of the False
The darkening of the Sun, the Moon, etc.
will now take place. The Heavens will be in an upheaval. [Luke 21:11, 25-26;
24:29; Mark 13:24-25; Joel
In the “three days of darkness” document it states:
the End of These Times, when Our Lord comes to gather the elect (3) will be some time after the Three Days of Darkness.
The manifestation of the real the False Christ will be after the
Three Days of Darkness.
I assumed that
step 11 referred to the 3
days of darkness as no where in the General Sequence Document is this
event specifically identified. On this basis, I see an inconsistency
with respect to the appearance of the False Christ, as Step 11 “heralds
the end of
the False Christ", while the “three days of darkness” document heralds
the appearance of the False Christ.
This is the inconsistency that I refer to, and without a specific
reference to the three days of darkness prophecy in the General
Sequence document, other than what I interpret Step 11 to mean, you can
see the need for clarification.
Thank You for your response.
Thank you for the opportunity to clarify this - and
taking the time to do it so thoroughly.
Yes, we can see where the possibility for confusion can arise. As few
believe - although it really is - the prophetic documents that we
publish are not the product of miguel de Portugal's (4)
intellectual logic. This means that he does not necessarily know the
explanation for all that he has written in the Name of God. As a
matter of fact, he learns much as he is actually writing many of the
documents and, at times, when he reads them again after some time he
has no recollection that he wrote that.
Given that background - our answer to your question is: miguel does not know where the Three
Days of Darkness exactly fall except for the boundaries that he has
already set and which you quoted in your letter. Any other
answer would be a fabrication by his intellect and that, he does not
trust. His trust is placed in the Wisdom of God and not on the
intellect of fallen men.
Actually, he does not know how widespread and to what depth the
destruction mentioned in the Three Days of Darkness document will be
since that still is in mankind's hands (5).
Remember - we are "working" for a Green Apocalypse whereby most of the
destruction are caused by geological and astronomical events as opposed
to the result of a massive global nuclear holocaust.
Rest assured that when he knows more details - as God Wills it - he
will publish them.
Once again, thank you for your assistance and interest. This is the
type of criticism that we appreciate - constructive criticism.
clarification about the
Days of Darkness
Sequence of Events
Leading to the End of These Times
(3) How God
determines who is
included in The Elect
(4) About miguel
de Portugal and the
function of The M+G+R Foundation
Mankind's Cooperation in the Redemption of Mankind - Part I and
From TJ @
US - Published
on August 17th, 2007
The Holy Spirit has been working overtime lately, giving you insights
that are astounding to me, and removing much doubt about the source of
much of your writing.
There are surely other “doubting Thomases” out there, but I know I am
one, so just a few words in our defense (those of us who mean well and
in spite of our sins, are genuinely desirous of God’s truth):
the apostle did indeed doubt, but repented, and gave his life
for the Lord in the end. Even his doubt served to advance the
cause. The same might be true today.
* Nobody less than St. Paul believed
Jesus was coming in his time, and
Corinthians is full of these references. He seems later to have
changed his emphasis. His theology was also very rich and guided
by the Holy Spirit, yet this does not assure that the listener is
perfectly in tune on all subjects.
* St. Paul went so far as to advise
people not to marry nor have
children, because there was no time. This does not seem to me to
be God’s will, nor is it to not have children today. By all
means, we should put our spiritual lives in order because world
circumstances suggest this is all possible, but I don’t see how we
should suspend the regular cycles of life since we do not know the day
* Since if the day of the Lord is really
near, then there is no place
to hide on earth and disrupting the routines of life is as likely to
increase suffering as to avoid any calamity. A little bit of
doubt, if it keeps people from changing the business of feeding their
families and helping their communities (but not from spiritual
renewal), is a good thing.
Again, the peace of the Lord be with you, for you have brought it to me
on many occasions.
Thank you for the opportunity to publicly address the
you bring to our attention.
First of all, there is no need to "defend" the "doubting Thomases out
there" since they are not being attacked. We use that term in the
same manner we may say (to a strictly US audience) "I am from
Missouri" meaning, tongue in cheek, that "I have to see it to believe
it" since, as you must know, that saying was derived from the fact that
Missouri is the "Show Me State". Of course, there must be some real
Thomases out there - those who have no real faith - just intellectual
Those who have to see to believe do not have real faith; their faith is
intellectual - a faith which will
not withstand great adversity.
Jesus saith to him: Because thou hast seen me, Thomas, thou
hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and have believed.
However, when we use that term is not with that exact
Biblical meaning in mind. Actually - a little doubt is most helpful
as we will explain later.
Regarding Paul statement - we have covered those issues extensively in
one of our
and some of your questions/doubts/concerns will be clarified in
Regarding whether Paul was really expecting the Second Coming then -
God has not charged miguel (2)
to broach that subject yet but, when He
does, we shall comply and you will read it on our pages.
Back to a "little bit of doubt" and how helpful it can be. Friend -
miguel has been, in what can be considered, a 16 year long stay in
Gethsemani. Although not necessary any more - initially he maintained
his sanity by enjoying the solace that only some doubt (not of God!)
can give. Although he
proceeded in the fulfillment of the Will of God - on the scene (3) and
behind the scenes (4)
- he did take some comfort in the fact that "...hey,
maybe I am a little wrong". Of course as prophecies became news
became history that oasis of comfort wore out and now he cannot use it
- nor is it necessary for him any longer.
However, we must not confuse "a little bit of doubt" with "denial" (5). One - a little bit of
helps the Faithful to constructively cope with the day to day living
while spiritually preparing what is to come; the second one - denial
- is a ring
side seat for untold suffering if the individual in question is
targeted for Heaven.
Regarding what is probably the most quoted Bible Verse in the last 20
years: "...you know not the day nor
the hour..." [Matt. 25:13]
Our response is from the same source: 32 And from the fig tree learn a
parable: When the branch thereof is now tender, and the leaves come
forth, you know that summer is nigh.
33 So you also, when you shall see all these
things, know ye that it is nigh, even at the doors.
34 Amen I say to you, that this generation
shall not pass, till all these things be done.
35 Heaven and earth shall pass, but my words
shall not pass. [Matt. 24]
In addition - He said "day nor
hour" and that leaves out month and year, doesn't it? (6) (7)
Once again, thank you for the opportunity to come to the assistance of
warnings from St. Paul
is miguel de Portugal
the scenes - a sample (the site mgr.org)
the scenes - a sample
real danger associated with the state of denial.
time is it?
about that time!
From LR @
US - Published
on August 11th, 2007
My girl friend and I have been in recent discussion about
purgatory. I always explain to her that we both agree a soul must
be pure before entering heaven. There are verses that show
purgatory is a process and takes time because “… until Jesus pleads my
case,” and in the Bible it explains sins can be forgiven in the next
age Matt 12:32. There are verses that explain purgatory.
My understanding is purgatory is a place that people go to because they
did not fulfill the will of God here on Earth and must do their
penance. As a result purgatory is needed to get rid of all the
vices that hold us from loving God and this process takes time.
My question is that she always states that with the existence of
purgatory it proves that Jesus’ sacrifice is not enough. Further,
in the Old Testament it talks about Sheol and in the New Testament
Hades. She states that Jesus is the new covenant and the old
covenant is Sheol (similarity to Purgatory). Thus Jesus did away
with Sheol because of Him being the new covenant. Further, she
states that Purgatory seems to be a HUGE salvation issue and people
should know about it, yet it is not stated as bluntly as other aspects
in the Bible, how can I show her it is well documented (Using the Bible
of course, sola scriptura, though this belief is contradictory in
itself when analyzing Scripture)?
I want to be able to answer her questions to the fullest (even though
my responses make sense to me), but how do I keep the discussion simple
while answering these “conundrums” to her? Could you please
define purgatory and penance and answer how purgatory is still
necessary even with faith and Jesus’ Death and Resurrection.
Further, how the Old Testament references to Sheol are still relevant
to Christians that believe the Old Testament (Old Covenant) does not
apply to them.
Thank you for your time,
Thank you for the opportunity. Without getting bogged
down with words a la Vatican let
us go directly where Jesus illustrates the reality of Purgatory:
56 You hypocrites, you know how to discern
the face of the
heaven and of the earth: but how is it that you do not discern this
57 And why even of yourselves, do you not
judge that which is just?
58 And when thou goest with thy adversary to
the prince, whilst
thou art in the way, endeavour to be delivered from him: lest perhaps
he draw thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the exacter,
and the exacter cast thee into prison.
59 I say to thee, thou shalt not go out
thence, until thou pay the very last mite. [Luke
One cannot present oneself before God "....until thou pay the very last mite", which
is after the payment has been made through prayer and
penance. (1) Jesus
was obviously not
talking about money.
There are two great misconceptions about Divine Law and Justice.
First - Jesus died to give
us an opportunity to save our souls. It is not an automatic
process, i.e. "He died for my sins, I
sign up in the local Christian
Church and, presto!, I am saved." Unfortunately far too many
Christians believe that it is this way.
Secondly - The forgiveness of sins do not, in any way, mean that we are
"scott free". When a sin is forgiven, the eternal consequences of said
sin are avoided, however, restitution must be made for the damages
done. The restitution is adjusted
by what we call "Mercy coupons" or "Mercy discounts" dispensed by God (2).
Obviously a woman who has had an abortion due to recreational sex is
going to "pay more" (even after the mortal sin is forgiven)
than a woman who fell prey to her boyfriend's empty promises whose
debt, in turn, is higher than the debt of a woman who had an abortion
after being raped.
All trangressed a grave basic Dive Law: Thou
shalt not kill. However the circumstances where totally
different and that is why the Mercy of God is for - to temper the
Divine sentence after Divine Justice is applied.
To further clarify this matter we shall use terms that all can
One gets in debt "over the head" and must default on the payment of the
debt. It may come to a surprise to many but: that is stealing.
Now, that "bad debt" goes to "collection" - instead of slapping the
debtor in jail for theft. Terms for repayment are worked out,
considering all factors, while your credit, in essence, has been
suspended. Once you fulfill your restructured debt you may present
yourself before the "Throne of Creditors" again - you are now "clean"
and have "proven yourself" worthy of "their favor".
Before getting into inter-Faith discussions it is best to have a
working knowledge of the source of the Holy Scriptures (3)
and the awesome coherence that makes them stand "on its own two feet".
We are sure that you can take it from here and clarify any other areas
that you want to share with your girlfriend.
Prayer and Penance - Part I
and Part II
Mercy of God and Mercy In
(3) Biblical Literalism - Part I
and Part II
From LP @
US - Published
on August 6th, 2007 [Feast of the
While recently preparing a document about the False
Christ, I wanted to refer to the Church Fathers - specifically, the Didache,
one of the earliest summaries of the teachings of the Church. So,
I reviewed the following book off my shelf: Michael W. Holmes, The
Apostolic Fathers in English, 3rd ed., Baker Academic, 2006 - and
referred to the apocalyptic section of the Didache, paragraph
16, verses 3-8 (p. 171 of this book).
I was shocked when I read the
section - one that I had quoted previously, but using an older
collection of the writings of the Apostolic Fathers.
In the new translation,
it says (key part in bold):
"For in the last days the false
prophets and corrupters will
abound, and the sheep will be turned into wolves, and love will be
turned into hate. For as lawlessness increases, they will hate
persecute and betray one another. And then the deceiver of the
will appear as a son of God and will perform signs and wonders, and the
earth will be delivered into his hands, and he will commit abominations
the likes of which have never happened before. Then all humankind
come to the fiery test, and many will fall away and perish; but those
who endure in their faith will be saved by the accursed one himself.
And then there will appear the signs of the truth: first the sign of an
opening in heaven, then the sign of the sound of a trumpet, and
the resurrection of the dead - but not of all; rather, as it has been
said, 'The Lord will come, and all his saints with him.' Then
world see the Lord coming upon the clouds of heaven."
I was horrified at the bolded item; it says that those who endure
in faith to the end will be "saved by the accursed one himself" - the
false "son of God." There are some explanatory footnotes with
passage, but they shed confusion rather than light.
I wound up looking for an older translation of the same work and
found this (key part in bold):
"For in the last days false prophets
and corrupters shall be
multiplied, and the sheep shall be turned into wolves, and love shall
be turned into hate; for when lawlessness increases, they shall hate
and persecute and betray one another, and then shall appear the
world-deceiver as Son of God, and shall do signs and wonders, and the
earth shall be delivered into his hands, and he shall do iniquitous
things which have never yet come to pass since the beginning. Then
shall the creation of men come into the fire of trial, and many shall
be made to stumble and shall perish; but those who endure in
their faith shall be saved from under the curse itself.
And then shall appear the signs of the truth: first, the sign of an
outspreading in heaven, then the sign of the sound of the trumpet. And
third, the resurrection of the dead -- yet not of all, but as it is
said: 'The Lord shall come and all His saints with Him.' Then shall the
world see the Lord coming upon the clouds of heaven."
The older translation refers to the salvation of the faithful
"from under the curse", rather than by "the accursed one
That older reading makes sense.
The new translation, with its implication of salvation by the
"accursed one," seems to be widely accepted. I talked to my
about this problem, and he referred me to two alternative books of the
Apostolic Fathers' writings. I looked at one of them, a Loeb
version (Greek on the left, and English on the right) - edited by Bart
Ehrman. Before spending money on the book, I looked up section 16
the Didache - and found the same translation problem as I had in the
other modern edition.
Symbolically - certainly not intending it as a qualifier
of the writer in question but at a reality that does exist to a great
extent - we quote
the following passages of the New Testament:
1 John 14: 9 Jesus saith to him: Have I been so long a
time with you; and have you not known me?
2 Matthew 17 16 Then Jesus answered and said: O
unbelieving and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you? How
long shall I suffer you?
Due to our frequent repetition of it - our by-line should by now be:
satan must serve God for He is the uncreated Creator and all of creation is subject
Perhaps the new translation is indeed the correct one. Did not
satan propitiate the Salvation of mankind by causing Judas Iscariot to
betray Jesus Christ unto His crucifixion - without being free, at all,
from the consequences of the atrocious sin he was committing?
This is not endorsing the blasphemy tacitly endorsed by the Vatican
that Judas Iscariot was in cahoots with Jesus Christ to save humanity (1). Judas Iscariot sinned
as an act of his free will but God - Who Is the Master of Creation -
used Judas' sin to free His Elect from the bondage of satan.
Therefore, the new translation may be showing the "fingerprint of God"
even if it was not the intent of the translator.
What greater "Grand Slam" for God than cause (and brethren, He can
cause anything He Wills to) the accursed one himself to be the
instrument He uses to deliver His Elect.
We are already tasting and rejoicing at such Magnificent display of
Divine Mercy and Glory! Hallelujah!
Thank you for the opportunity highlighting one more time our "by-line"
and the pleasure of savoring a bit of the Divine Grand Slam!
(1) The Sin
of Judas Part I and Part II
From Initials Withheld @ US -
Published on August 5th, 2007
Q. I have a question
about Genesis 22, the story of Abraham's willingness to sacrifice Isaac
at (what he believed to be) the command of God.
Every church tradition that I am aware of - Protestant, Anglican,
Catholic, and Orthodox - holds up this story as an exemplar of the
faith of Abraham, and of the corresponding faithfulness and mercy of
God (because of God's provision of a substitute sacrifice). This
is how the text is preached everywhere, among liberals and
During the first six years of my life as an adult Christian (from
mid-1978 till November 1984), I did not challenge or doubt this
preaching. I do now, and with these questions:
What about Isaac and his own experience
of the event?
What could have been going through his mind as (Gen. 22:5-8) he and his
father traveled together to Mount Moriah?
What doubt and dread would have been growing in Isaac's mind -
especially if human sacrifice was a common custom in that time and
What would have Isaac have felt as his father bound him, put him on the
altar, and raised the knife above him to kill (Gen. 22:9-10)?
True enough, God intervened (Gen. 22:11-19). Did Isaac hear and
see the same mysterious and Divine things as Abraham did, or did he
just see his Dad hesitate, stop, free him, and sacrifice a ram that had
In the everyday world of this century, any father in a civilized
country who did as Abraham did in Gen. 22 would be sent to a hospital
for the criminally insane, and Child Protective Services would take the
child into care - with, one hopes, intensive therapy for the
almost-certain case of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder that the child
would be experiencing. In any age, a child who went through this
experience would be scarred for life - unless he were given a
miraculous healing, of the kind that is rare indeed.
To put my question bluntly:
If this event is key to the faith of the Abrahamic religions, to what
extent is the received tradition of these faiths based on (non-sexual)
I have mentioned this question privately to a few people over the
years, and never got a satisfactory answer.
I have never put the preceding material into writing, since it is
hear the word "heresy" or "heretics" we cringe because its real
meaning, to those who utter it, is: Heretics
are those who believe what I do not want them to believe because it
becomes a threat to my power base.
This is not new - it goes back to Akhenaten who has been dubbed by
Egyptologists as "The Heretical Pharaoh" (1) even though his belief
was more coherent with Divine realities than the belief of the
religious establishment of the time. John the Baptist and Jesus Christ
were also considered heretics.
It is like the much used by the Vatican word: Excommunication. Frankly, anyone
who receives an Excommunication note from the Vatican should send them
a Thank You! note. Who in his
right mind wants to be associated with that group (2)? We said "group" - not
Faith, since the Catholic Faith (East and West) is the faith which
contains the most revealed Truths of any faith (3) on the face of the Earth.
With that clarification made, let us get back to your original
question: If this event is key to
the faith of the Abrahamic religions, to what extent is the received
tradition of these faiths based on (non-sexual) child abuse?
To understand what went through Abraham's and Isaac's minds we must
slip into their shoes and
time frame. (4)
Even today - in some cultures "father indeed knows best" and if the
father in question is a loving and God obeying father, the son, even
though naturally fearful, would submit with much less trauma than most
westerners of the 21st century would. Then, after the 11th hour
deliverance, the son's faith and respect for his father would have been
Unfortunately, said passage, as most are, is improperly presented from
the pulpits, thus the endemic disorientation of the followers of just
about any organized religion.
It has been given m de P to understand many of the workings of the
spiritual Domain. Therefore, we can say with assurance that the
Abraham - Isaac experience not only was logical but was an absolute
necessity for the salvation of humanity.
Man had to be willing offer to God the life of his most prized
possession (yes, in those days children and wives were the father's
most prized "possessions") - the most awaited, and almost given up hope
for, son - BEFORE God would offer the human life of His Only Son, Jesus
Christ, so that humanity had an opportunity for Salvation. (Salvation
had been a given reality for mankind at creation, but was lost because
Eve tried to be God-like and Adam believed her rather than God.)
Divine Law demanded that Abraham endure such a severe test of his
Faith. [We say "test" and
not "temptation" as some Biblical translations state. God does not tempt man, satan
is the one who tempts man.]
For a deeper discussion regarding the faith of Abraham, the uncalled
for interference of the Patriarchs' Biblical wives, and the horrendous
consequences of this interference with the Divine Plan, we recommend a
newly published document titled: Understanding
The Beginning of the Discord in the Middle East
Heretical Pharaoh" had
position regarding the Roman Catholic Church Administration
position regarding the Catholic Faith
that allow man to better understand the spiritual world
From LP @
US - Published
on August 1st, 2007
Q. Regarding your
communication with the subject of: Another
insult to the Immaculate Heart of
I agree that the "fall" of Communism and the USSR was
"Triumph" of the Immaculate Heart. However, I would be cautious
about using the Daily Mail
article linked to as proof.
1. It is from the British press, and
they are very bad sources
of information (as bad as Fox News in the US, or worse). I have learned
this the hard way ... tracking down sensational bites from their
stories about the Roman Catholic Church or the Anglican world, as part
of my professional writing assignments, and finding out that the real
story has only a tenuous
connection to what the Brits reported.
2. The story is very badly written, so that (among other things) it is
unclear whether the state sponsored procreation is among the new
civilly married couples, or whether the participants are unlimited.
3. In the story, no fact is
allowed to speak for itself;
every paragraph is loaded with leading adjectives. The
problems extend to the photo caption: it claims that the picture is of
"millions of young Russians at a youth camp discerningly similar to the
Hitler Youth" ... and the main text of the story talks of a youth camp
attended by ten thousand.
4. The UK is now on bad terms with the Russians. This story reads
wartime (or pre-war) propaganda. Note the description of the
the Daily Mail story:
"Edward Lucas is author of the
forthcoming The New Cold War
And How To Win It. ". In other words, let the reader beware.
Thank you for sharing with us your experience with, and
the British Press. It is indeed worth noting, however...
It was not our intention to use it as "proof" of the lack of the
Triumph. It was more of a reminder. Keep in mind that
physical "proof" we may publish is to assist our readers on seeing the
truth since most humans seem to have DNA ties with the Apostle Thomas.
We know that the Triumph has not taken place but, as you know, most
people "need a face" to assist in their understanding and accepting a
It is like with Opus Dei - we have the document exposing their agenda [
] and published a few
articles/situations/events as "proof" of that. We knew that the Opus
Dei agenda was from hell without even knowing exactly what Opus Dei was
in earthly terms.
You will read about this more as we deal with a trick question that
came in regarding our document on the True Petrine Ministry [
The question has to do with the play of words cephas and kephas
and the writer, a philosophy professor of St. Thomas University (and
probably an Opus Dei member), thinks that, if we made an error with
that one illustration we used, it will render our entire charge
the Church was not founded upon Peter but upon Christ - the Living Word
of God. Wrong!
We KNOW, plain and simple, that the Church WAS NOT founded on any
feeble human but on the Word of God - Jesus Christ - period; and, as we
have made clear many times, we function on a take it or leave it
basis - we are not running a popularity contest, running for office
nor raising funds (Ha! Ha!) and certainly could not care less about
pleasing man if to do so we must betray the charge given to
miguel de Portugal by God.
Back to Russia.... all one needs to do is visit the home page of the
Russian Pravda (or was it the Depraved?) [ http://english.pravda.ru/
to see that the Triumph has not even passed over Russia yet.
Once again, Thank you! for your valued criticism since it will be quite
useful when reviewing matters on the British Press for which we have
not yet been given lights and for all of our readers who are wise
enough to heed it.
From (Mrs.) JS @ US - Published on July 31st, 2007
Q. satan roams the earth
seeking whom he may devour, seduction by Enlightened
leadership. We should fear every form of domination!
There are good things about the Ecumenism movement, to be sure, but it
seems that the O. D. fingerprint is all over the protestant church in
USA, both the so-called liberals and the so-called fundamentalists.
By every means EXCEPT dedication to God and prayer, they seek to
control society and the government for their own agenda. They
behave just like aggressive homosexuals seeking converts: innocent,
generous, charming, and ultimately controlling.
Is there a known connection between O.D. and the protestants, or is the
similarity just in the satanic fingerprint?
A. As we have
stated before, they will make alliances with whomever they think will
advance their own agenda, and then move on leaving the former "allies"
This may be seen even through the writings of a friend, not an enemy. A
Spanish Historian who even said: So
that my [de la Cierva's] evaluation be better understood I will
summarize it as follows: Opus Dei was invented, and invented well;
however, if it did not exist, it would have to be invented with great
urgency. Many things, especially within the Church, depend on it.
Even though, you may want to review the
rest of his comments for a real eye opener.
We also published another example - although there are so many that we
could make a full time job of keeping a Blog on it - where we see their alliance with the Promise Keepers.
Ultimately, if you review our document - The Saviors of the World Are Having
Family Problems - you will see how those alliances work and how
they fail. A failure about which we
warned the Vatican during John Paul II Pontificate and which will eventually crush them.
Once they were warned officially - our hands are washed.
Thank you for the opportunity to set this record clear.
Published in August 2007
Format updated on January 28th, 2021
© Copyright 2007 - 2021 by The M+G+R Foundation.
All rights reserved. However, you may
freely reproduce and distribute this document as long as: (1)
Appropriate credit is given as to its source; (2) No changes are made
in the text without prior written consent; and (3) No charge is made
The M+G+R Foundation
Us || Frequently
Asked Questions || Disclaimer
Our Research Department
Please Note: If the above dated image does not appear
on this document, it means that you are not viewing the original
document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to
view the original document.
If you wish to contact The M+G+R Foundation, please
access our Contact Page and follow the