Does the End Justify the Means
translate this text into a major language Click Here
It is our purpose and intent with this document to illustrate that in
certain circumstances the end justifies the means as long as the
situation is being corrected permanently while the "means" are being
We have chosen a letter sent by one of our regular readers from the US
and our response to it to explain what we mean when we say that "in certain circumstances the end
justifies the means".
I have always believed that the end never justifies the means. Yet, you
proposed that the exception be made for the people of Africa for the
use of condoms to help prevent AIDS... just for a certain length of
This confuses me, however, I totally agree with you on this matter as
people are killing each other.
They do not have "Eyes to See or Ears to Hear". How can one justify bad
behavior by saying someone is sick?
How can we forgive those who accept bad money for a good cause, in
How do you explain to a non-Christian that God allows bad things to
happen? Accidents, victims of crime?
I know well of free choice but it does not convince a non-believer.
Forgive me for all of the questions, but you are my family and I trust
all of you as I know you are doing God's Will and I believe in you.
I wish I had 3 months just to sit and listen to you.
God Bless you for all of your patience, love and understanding.....
especially of the weak ones like me.
In His Name and Grace,
Thank your for writing and sharing your concerns
We also believe, and have frequently said, that the "End does not
justify the means", however, we must evaluate each individual situation
with the Light of the Holy Spirit to see how we should get from point
"A" (living outside the Law of God) to point "B" (living within the Law
The first step is to determine the "Why" of the point "A" and its
consequences - short term and long term.
We shall take first the killing of another human being as a point "A" -
this is extremely grave under any circumstances : There is no just war;
there is no just killing. Logically, point "B" is the stopping of the
killing of human beings.
Say that we have an individual who is prone to kill other humans due to
X,Y and Z reasons and does so on a regular basis. Maybe he does not
know that "Thou shalt not kill" is a real and absolute Divine Law.
Obviously, he needs to be instructed in Divine Law and needs to be
assisted in his conversion - however, in the meantime, he cannot be
allowed to go around killing people until "the Evangelization" takes a
hold of his soul. He must be stopped for the benefit of others and
Now, let us take up birth control as another point "A" situation.
What is the root problem of artificial birth control? Sexual
interaction without responsibility becomes just another sport - where
one may even switch partners just as we may do for a tennis
match. The more uneducated the individual is and the less means
of entertainment he/she may have, the more he/she will turn to sex
and/or drugs as an "entertaining sport". The more bored a rich
and well educated individual gets, the more he/she will also turn to
sex and/or drugs as an "entertaining sport".
Promiscuous sex and the use of drugs are the two societal maladies
which can harm a soul the most. Thus, logically God has allowed
AIDS. He is more interested in our soul within the overall Eternal
picture, than just the brief time it resides in a body on Earth. If
some activity is going to gravely harm the soul - He rather take them
Home soon. (1)
In the birth control situation - We could then take two positions: (a)
Let them destroy themselves and thus "help God"; or (b) Intervene and
help them find the way to God in a more natural way.
If we take position (a), it would logically follow, to the derange
mind, that all sick and poor people should be exterminated.... and
"...by doing this we are doing them a favor and serving God along."
Believe it or not, that thinking is "on the table" of the Future
Masters of the world.
If we take position (b), we assist them in not killing each other,
through unprotected sexual intercourse, by providing them with the
appropriate protection WHILE simultaneously Evangelizing them
so that they will abandon the "Outside the Laws of God" lifestyle,
i.e. "Sexual activity is a sport."
In certain countries of Europe they established a "Clean Syringe
Program" wherein the drug addicts would turn in their used syringes and
get clean ones in order to arrest the spread of AIDS through sharing
infected syringes. This was done WITHOUT any Evangelization, therefore,
what on the surface looked like a very charitable act was indeed
contributing to the further degradation of their souls.
This would be the same if we just pass out condoms and do nothing else.
(a) Passing out condoms to
prevent the spread of AIDS via sexual intercourse - and do nothing
else - to save lives cannot be considered as a "means justified by
the end" - because we are working against God by helping in the
destruction of souls.
Of course, this
thinking could degenerate into a philosophical discussion about the
difference or equivalence of murdering/killing with a gun, for example,
and killing with an AIDS contaminated sexual liaison. However, we must
keep in mind that: Death by gunshot is quick and little can be done to
draw the soul to God before separation of soul and body. Death through
AIDS is slow and much can be done to draw that soul to God before its
separation. Therefore - we cannot compare, nor treat alike, both
methods of killing a body.
(b) Passing out condoms to prevent the spread of AIDS via sexual
intercourse - and implement a solid Evangelization program to
change the mentality of the individuals through Light and Grace -
is a method of "buying time" while the leaven of the kingdom of heaven
works its wonders in their souls - thus we are cooperating with God'
plan for His children. [The kingdom of heaven is like to leaven,
which a woman took and hid in three measures of meal, until the whole
was leavened. [Matthew 13:33]]
Regarding your other question: "How
do you explain to a non-Christian that God allows bad things to
happen? Accidents, victims of crime? " The full answer may be
found in footnote (2).
Regarding whatever "...does not
convince a non-believer" - that is
the responsibility of the Elect. We are to take a horse to water, drink
of it so that the horse sees that it quenches our thirst with no
ill effects; then, if the horse still refuses to drink, we must allow
the horse to die of thirst or at least go thirsty for a while until it
realizes its error. The Elect never were, nor will ever be,
part of the Inquisition crowd. Their technique would have been
"choking the horse to death" while force feeding him water to "keep him
Yes, that is how ridiculous and pathetic the alleged Evangelization has
been in the last ca. 1600 years.... and stay tuned, as we have already
explained, it will be tried again. (3)
(1) The near
and Geological Events Worldwide
(2) Pain is the
, Divine Mercy in Action - Part
I and Part
similarity of the French Revolution with the activities "scheduled" for
End of These Times
When there is a will, there is a way... and when it
is God's Will... get out of the way!
on January 14th, 2020
2020 by The M+G+R
Foundation. All rights reserved. However, you may freely reproduce and
distribute this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as
to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without prior
written consent; and (3) No charge is made for it.
About Us and
Note: If the above dated image
does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the
original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to
view the original document.
you wish to contact
The M+G+R Foundation, please Click
follow the instructions.