The M+G+R Foundation

Trump and the Invasion of the West (1)

A Guest Document by

Patrick J. Buchanan


June 20, 2018

To translate this text into any major language Click Here



INTRODUCTION
  by The M+G+R Foundation

We are publishing this Guest Document in an effort to give those who read our pages a better understanding of what is really taking place, even though Mr. Buchanan has no idea what the ultimate objective of these events really is.

We are in a position to objectively comment on this matter because of the on-the-ground and lived-in experiences that we have had in both continents, experience which is minor in comparison with what God has revealed miguel de Portugal about this subject matter over the last quarter of a century - all of which we are seeing happening before our own eyes.

As you read the following article remember the key objective of the World Masters - the one they think is their goal: Globalization. What better way to reach their golden dream than to promote mass exodus in the Americas and in the European an African continents. It is hard to think of a better way to promote and achieve the global instability that they need to establish a New World Order. What they do not know is that satan is using them to pave the way for his grad entrance as the falsified savior of the world.

What a pathetic group. If they could see themselves with our vision they would virtually die of embarrassment and shame. They are not even good at being bad! That is the highest degree of failure.

We will add a few comments at the end of the Guest Document.


The Full un Edited Article

“It is cruel. It is immoral. And it breaks my heart,” says former first lady Laura Bush of the Trump administration policy of “zero tolerance,” under which the children of illegal migrants are being detained apart from their parents.

“Disgraceful,” adds Dr. Franklin Graham.

“We need to be … a country that governs with a heart,” says first lady Melania Trump. “No one likes this policy,” says White House aide Kellyanne Conway, even “the president wants this to end.”

And so it shall - given the universal denunciations and photos of sobbing children being pulled from parents. Yet striking down the policy will leave America’s immigration crisis still unresolved.

Consider. Since 2016, some 110,000 children have entered the U.S. illegally and been released, along with 200,000 Central American families caught sneaking across the border.

Reflecting its frustration, the White House press office declared:

“We can’t deport them, we can’t separate them, we can’t detain them, we can’t prosecute them. What (the Democrats) want is a radical open-border policy that lets everyone out into the interior of this country with virtually no documentation whatsoever.”

Where many Americans see illegal intruders, Democrats see future voters.

And with 11,000 kids of illegal immigrants in custody and 250 more arriving every day, we could have 30,000 in custody by summer’s end.

The existential question, however, thus remains: How does the West, America included, stop the flood tide of migrants before it alters forever the political and demographic character of our nations and our civilization?

The U.S. Hispanic population, already estimated at nearly 60 million, is predicted to exceed 100 million by 2050, just 32 years away.

And Europe’s southern border is more imperiled than ours.

A week ago, the new populist regime in Rome refused to allow a boat full of migrants from Libya to land in Sicily. Malta also turned them away. After a voyage of almost a week and 1,000 miles, 630 migrants were landed in Valencia, Spain.

Why did Italy reject them? Under EU law, migrants apply for asylum in the country where they first enter Europe. This burdens Italy and Greece where the asylum-seekers have been arriving for years.

Of the landing in Spain, Italy’s interior minister Matteo Salvini, a leader of the populist League party, chortled:

“I thank the Spanish government. I hope they take in the other 66,629 refugees (inside Italy). We will not be offended if the French follow the Spanish, the Portuguese and Maltese, we will be the happiest people on earth.”

If the migrants boats of the Med are redirected to Spanish ports, one suspects that the Spanish people will soon become as unwelcoming as many other peoples in Europe.

And Trump is not backing down. Monday he tweeted:

“The people of Germany are turning against their leadership as migration is rocking the already tenuous Berlin coalition. Crime in Germany is way up. Big mistake made all over Europe in allowing millions of people in who have so strongly and violently changed their culture!”

Whatever European leaders may think of him, many Europeans are moving in Trump’s direction, toward more restrictions on immigration.

In Germany, a political crisis is percolating. The Bavarian-based CSU, longtime coalition partner of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s CDU, is now talking divorce if Merkel does not toughen German policy.

Merkel has never fully recovered from the nationalist backlash against the million migrants she allowed in from Syria’s civil war. A New Year’s Eve rampage in Cologne, featuring wilding attacks on German girls by Arabs and Muslims, cost her dearly.

Among the reasons Bavarians are pulling away from Berlin is that, being in the south of Germany, Bavaria is a primary point of entry.

Virtually every one of the populist parties of Europe, especially of the right, have arisen to contest or to seize power by riding the issue of mass migration from Africa and the Middle East.

Yet the progressives adamantly refuse to act, apparently paralyzed by a belief that restricting the free movement of peoples from foreign lands violates one of the great commandments of liberal democracy.

We are truly dealing here with an ideology of Western suicide.

The population of Africa, right across the Med, is anticipated to climb to 2.5 billion by midcentury. And by 2100, Africa will be home half of all the people of the planet.

If but a tiny fraction of the African and Middle Eastern population decides to cross the Mediterranean to occupy the emptying towns and villages of an aging and dying continent, who and what will stop them?

Trump may be on the wrong side politically and emotionally of this issue of separating migrant kids from their parents.

But on the mega-issue - the Third World invasion of the West - he is riding the great wave of the future, if the West is to have a future.


CONCLUSION
by The M+G+R Foundation

miguel de Portugal witnessed - first hand - the breaking down of all internal borders in Europe as the European Union "wonderland" was taking shape. He also witnessed the establishment of the one currency - the Euro - and, since then, he has witnessed the collapse of Europe as the result of such half baked European "wonderland". A collapse in all fronts - from moral to standard of living to security.

He witnessed the implementation of many features of the U.S. system - out of context, of course - in their "wonderland",  while he has also witnessed the implementation of many of the European Union failed features in the U.S. - also out of context. The results of such out of context alleged improvements is what we are witnessing at either side of the Atlantic, which is in keeping with the Globalization efforts of the intellectually and spiritually challenged Masters of the World.

They are using the innocent people of the world - yes, those poor children and their parents - to advance their agenda while those whom they have planted in the media, the NGO's, and the alleged Christian Groups yell "Foul!" to attain the desired result among the uninformed and unsuspecting masses.

After the Castro regime took over Cuba and proceeded to reduce a first world country into rubble, 10 % of the Cuban population emigrated to the United States. At that time the Federal, State and Municipal governments swung into action and the 600,000 plus wave of immigrants became a positive and constructive force in the United States. Why? Because the flow of immigrants was well organized and administered and there were no hidden agendas or ulterior purposes. So, we have seen - and lived !! -  that first hand too and know that it can be done.

In closing.... In an editorial in June 19th, 2018, (2) the National Review explained what must happen next. "Most critics don't grapple with the fact that the administration literally doesn't have the option of holding parents and kids together for more than a few weeks," the editors wrote. "Congress has it within its power to make it possible to hold families together and - if they don't have legitimate asylum claims - swiftly return them home together."

_____________________________
(1) Original Source
(2) Source



Published on June 20th, 2018


The M+G+R Foundation
About Us and Frequently Asked Questions


PAGE of INTRODUCTION to DOMAIN


HOME PAGE

HOME PAGE - Español

HOME PAGE - Portugues

Back Up HOME PAGE



Our Research Department

To Search for Information Within Our Domain Click Here

Document Indexes: - Sorted by Title - Sorted by File Name


Future Use

Please Note: If the above dated image does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to view the original document.

If you wish to contact The M+G+R Foundation, please Click Here.