The Real Purpose of the Castro
Regime
Footnote 3
Gorbachev Calls for "Central Soviet" To Run Global Economy
If anyone had ever any questions about the validity of what we have published regarding the New World Order, the excerpts of the following article recently published in The Wanderer (1) should dispel any and all doubts.
On September 21, 2000, Paul Likoudis writes in The Wanderer...
NEW YORK - Former Soviet Communist Party boss Mikhail Gorbachev, founder of the State of the World
Forum six years ago, used a $5,000 per person gathering of the world's political and business
elite to plea for the United Nations to adopt a Soviet-style "central
authority" to manage the world's business and environmental concerns.
Speaking at the New York Hilton and Towers on "the state of the world" one day before the world's political leaders took to the podium to deliver five-minute speeches calling for a stronger UN with tax-gathering capabilities and an international police force to act as a global cop, the Soviet leader who oversaw perestroika and the dismantling of the Soviet system in Eastern Europe complained that "globalization" has only benefited rich nations at the expense of the poor.
Gorbachev made a similar appeal in 1992, before the institution of such powerful agencies as NAFTA, GATT, and the WTO, the Maastricht Treaty, and the Asia-Pacific Economic Community Agreement, which are now the de facto tools for implementing his current proposal.
"Globalization has been privatized," he said on September 5. "It has been Westernized and Americanized."
He objected that "transnational corporations" hold monopolies on patents and all new technologies, and the benefits they generate rarely trickle down to the poor. Thus, he said, the United Nations must establish a Soviet-like authority that would direct international economics and the environment.
Gorbachev's well-received speech represents the coming of age for the United Nations, and a culmination of the Soviet Union's patient efforts (and faith in long-term planning) over the past 65 years, ever since Stalin proposed a three-stage process for achieving world government at the 1936 Comintern meeting in Moscow:
Speaking at the New York Hilton and Towers on "the state of the world" one day before the world's political leaders took to the podium to deliver five-minute speeches calling for a stronger UN with tax-gathering capabilities and an international police force to act as a global cop, the Soviet leader who oversaw perestroika and the dismantling of the Soviet system in Eastern Europe complained that "globalization" has only benefited rich nations at the expense of the poor.
Gorbachev made a similar appeal in 1992, before the institution of such powerful agencies as NAFTA, GATT, and the WTO, the Maastricht Treaty, and the Asia-Pacific Economic Community Agreement, which are now the de facto tools for implementing his current proposal.
"Globalization has been privatized," he said on September 5. "It has been Westernized and Americanized."
He objected that "transnational corporations" hold monopolies on patents and all new technologies, and the benefits they generate rarely trickle down to the poor. Thus, he said, the United Nations must establish a Soviet-like authority that would direct international economics and the environment.
Gorbachev's well-received speech represents the coming of age for the United Nations, and a culmination of the Soviet Union's patient efforts (and faith in long-term planning) over the past 65 years, ever since Stalin proposed a three-stage process for achieving world government at the 1936 Comintern meeting in Moscow:
[A] socialize the world's governments;
[B] bring about regional unions of various groupings of these socialized nations; and
[C] amalgamate these regional groupings, (such as the European Union) into a final worldwide union of socialist states.
[B] bring about regional unions of various groupings of these socialized nations; and
[C] amalgamate these regional groupings, (such as the European Union) into a final worldwide union of socialist states.
Further down in The Wanderer's article we read...
Gorbachev's call for a "central authority" was seconded by multi, multibillionaire financier
George Soros, who made his fortune as a currency speculator.
Reflecting on the anti-World Trade Organization riots in Seattle last fall, Soros described rioters - and the U.S. Congress - as "dangers to international institutions."
Reflecting on the anti-World Trade Organization riots in Seattle last fall, Soros described rioters - and the U.S. Congress - as "dangers to international institutions."
We read further...
A Conservative News Service (CNS) report on the conference said the ultimate aim of the agenda
is to limit the power and privileges of the world's wealthier countries, such as the United
States, through a global taxing system, an international court, and the elimination of
permanent member status and veto authority in the Security Council.
Henry Lamb, executive vice president of the Environmental Conservative Organization and a member of the nonprofit Sovereignty International agency, described the agenda as "frightening."
"It is one of the last means of control that the U.S. has over the UN.
"When you combine that recommendation with the global taxing proposals ... and international criminal courts", he continued, "we see the UN is posturing itself to have not only the authority but the means to implement and enforce national policy."
Henry Lamb, executive vice president of the Environmental Conservative Organization and a member of the nonprofit Sovereignty International agency, described the agenda as "frightening."
"It is one of the last means of control that the U.S. has over the UN.
"When you combine that recommendation with the global taxing proposals ... and international criminal courts", he continued, "we see the UN is posturing itself to have not only the authority but the means to implement and enforce national policy."
NOTES
(1) September 21, 2000, Paul Likoudis writes in The
Wanderer, a national Catholic weekly.
The Real Purpose of the Castro Regime
Why the Castro Regime has lasted for so long
Main Document
Index of Attached Documents (Footnotes)
Previous Footnote (1) Next Footnote (4)
Why the Castro Regime has lasted for so long
Main Document
Index of Attached Documents (Footnotes)
Previous Footnote (1) Next Footnote (4)
Note: There is, in our domain, another copy of this document that links to another thread of
documents and that is more up-to-date:
© Quoted Article Copyright Paul Likoudis / The Wanderer
© Comments and Notes Copyright 2000 - 2024 by The M+G+R Foundation.
All rights reserved. However, you may freely reproduce and distribute this document as long as:
(1) Appropriate credit is given as to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without
prior written consent; and (3) No charge is made for it.
Online since 1998
Introduction for First Visit
Frequently Asked Questions
Home Page English Español Portugues
Search Page Index of Documents
Disclaimer About Us Contact
Back Up Home Page (Mirror Site)
Home Page English Español Portugues
Search Page Index of Documents
Disclaimer About Us Contact
Back Up Home Page (Mirror Site)