The M+G+R Foundation

The Private Forum

July 2009



PURPOSE

The purpose of this Private Forum is to share with members of our Mailing List  the response to and/or comment of correspondence that we may receive from time to time and which is of Universal interest in these very unsettling times. Each List Member, may, at his/her discretion, share this page with others.

We reserve the right to choose what questions to address and how to transcribe the question and/or statement from the correspondence received. The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential except in the case of abusive correspondence which will then be referred to the appropriate responsible entities.

 

You are invited to be an instrument in keeping this Ministry active.
 It is now in your hands to do so!



From (Mr.) LP @ USA -
Published on July 31st, 2009

In reference to the posting of July 24th in the Did you know that...? (1) page I have a speculative/theology question, for you to consider if time and priorities allow.
 
Until now, the approach and imminence of the End of These Times was not revealed to the faithful. For almost 2,000 years, the usual teaching has been that Christ could return at any time, now or far in the future, so always be ready; no approximate time period for the Second Coming came from a credible source. The Return is certain, but its (approximate) time was veiled.
 
With this precedent, why would the date of the end of Creation be revealed now? (2)

It would seem that the reasons for keeping the time of the Second Coming veiled until just beforehand, would also apply to the End, and the General Judgment.
Maybe I have missed some critical differences between these events.

LP

A.
Excellent and well thought out question. We will attempt to answer what we know about it.

First - The idea/concept/instruction that
"Christ could return at any time, now or far in the future, so always be ready" obeys to the reality that the Second Coming of Christ must be viewed from two sides. When He comes to us in Glory and is met by the remnant at the End of These Times and  at the time of death when we go and meet Him. The call to be ready is applicable regardless of the "direction of travel".

Second - Why we reveal now that the End of Creation - also spoken of in the Book of Revelation - will take place in the year 2832?  At this point we can only assume that it serves as a reassurance (only) to those who believe the words spoken by miguel de Portugal, in the Name of God, that no matter how bad the situation will become at the End of These Times, the World IS NOT going to end.

Remember - satan's plan is to try to bring all to despair with the notion that the World is about to End and so that he is chosen to prevent it.

___________________________
(1)  Did you know that....? - July 2009
(2)  Through a mechanism that only God could design, involving several completely out of the ordinary situations, it was revealed to miguel that the End of Creation - spoken of in Revelations 20: 7-15 - will take place in the year 2832 AD



From (Mrs.) DL @ USA -
Published on July 26th, 2009 [Sts. Anne and Joachim - Grandparents of Jesus]

Peace to you miguel!

In reference to your mailing of July 23rd (1)....
 
Having been to Fatima and Italy, I am appalled at what is transpiring there.

When I was there, I felt such love from God and blessings from the people who surrounded me, (Lucia's Grandmother and Uncle), as well as the people I met and were with me.

How this immorality is occurring in a place that I feel is a holy place just disgusts me beyond horror!  I can't stand to see Portugal and Italy dissolve into such satanist disgust.

It really affects me to my soul.

I will pray for those poor mislead people to not become a part of what is being published and for their very souls in such danger!

I will always have the most beautiful memories of my times there and God help those fools!

(Mrs.) DL

A. Thank your writing and sharing with us your thoughts. The great tragedy is that such depravity has been underway for some time as you can read in a letter (2) we wrote to Mrs. Hillary Clinton in May of 1994. The reasons are also listed.

This is the first time we have published a letter from the over one hundred  letters and Faxes sent to the White House during the Clinton Presidency.
______________________
(1)  The alluded to part of the mailing:

Brethren, even being aware of where the world is heading and how deep in moral filth it is, we cannot avoid being surprised/shocked every day with what show up on the news. In the last two days alone....
1. In Spain - A home cocaine delivery service has been disrupted by the authorities. It was dubbed - Tele Coke (since a very popular pizza delivery service in Spain is called Tele Pizza). They worked on the same principle as the pizza delivery service.

2. In Spain - A popular general  interest, and suposedly serious, magazine had this month on the front cover - a young man and  woman nude - frontal shot - feeling each other. The Cover Article: The Biological Keys of Love

but if that were not  enough.....

3. In Portugal - It is being planned - for next year - to stage a Roman Circus-like set in Lisbon. With Gladiators and all. Open "traditonal" Roman orgies are also planned of the event. We are sure that no "dress" rehearsals will be needed....
These are not hush hush situations that you find only advertised in publications which come with the proverbial plain brown wrapper. These are mainstream news/magazines and "civic and cultural" programs.

Regular level headed people in both countries, individuals who one would consider more liberal than conservative, talk, with almost misty eyes, about the "good old days"  of the fascist dictatorships in both countries - both blessed by the Roman Catholic Church. Do you see how the paving is well underway for the Grand Finale extreme right wing global dictatorship endorsed through the Falsified Second Coming?

(2)  Letter to Mrs. Hillary Clinton - May, 1994


From TF @ USA - Published on July 24th, 2009

Peace be with with you Miguel!
 
As I read your latest document (1), the question naturally arises: Those destined for heaven cannot lose their salvation?
 
We do have free will, and how we exercise that free will, will dictate how much “hell” or how little “pain” we endure as we travel through this life… is that the message for those destined for heaven?
 
If so, is baptism a sign that one is truly a member of God's family, and thus a pre requisite for gaining salvation?
 
Is it possible for one to be saved WITHOUT baptism?  That would seem to be Unscriptural.  Thus, those who are not baptized, either with water, or blood, could not be amongst the saved.  Correct?

I believe you covered predestination previously, but in light of / context of this latest document, a clarification on this point seems in order especially for those who may be introduced to The M+G+R Foundation via this document.
 
Thank you for all you do and I will keep you and your ministry in my prayers.

TF

A. Simply superb questions which are greatly appreciated since many will benefit from this.

The response will be easier to follow if we reprint your letter below in italic lettering and respond in-between the lines in blue lettering. But, remember, we are trying to explain in Time and using human terms matters which are normally beyond our grasp.

The document in question is titled satan's Overall Game Plan or satan's Final Act (1) and was published on July 8th.

As I read your latest document, the question naturally arises: Those destined for heaven cannot lose their salvation?
 
That is correct. Remember, when we are born in Time - our soul is already in its final destination in the Eternal Frame. In Eternity there is no past or no future - only present. We know that both frames of reference are connected but as I intellectually journey into the understanding of such mystery it escapes my intellectual ability just as I am beginning to grasp it.. All that I know is that both Frames of reference are connected by a continuum spiral or cone like "something" where dynamic events in Time are freezing in a static form in Eternity as they progress through such spiral/cone. [This is the first time I am able to describe the phenomenon this far.]

We do have free will, and how we exercise that free will, will dictate how much “hell” or how little “pain” we endure as we travel through this life… is that the message for those destined for heaven?

Absolutely! However, I do not know if it is also applicable to those who are destined for hell. Although one hears about the "luck" so many evil people have through life; they seem to "get away with murder" with total impunity, which may indicate that they are not subject to it. No prophecy - just educated guess.
 
If so, is baptism a sign that one is truly a member of God's family, and thus a pre requisite for gaining salvation?

The true sign of being a member of the family of God is: ".... whosoever shall do the will of my Father, that is in heaven, he is my brother, and sister, and mother." [Matthew 12:50]

Regarding baptism: Yes, it is a prerequisite - if you knew about baptism and its purpose and were given the option; however, do you think that God would allow the eternal damnation of all
(2) who, because of the betrayal of those He entrusted with the Evangelization effort, were not baptized? Of course not! He has means to compensate for that - and which take place before the final separation of body and soul.

 
Is it possible for one to be saved WITHOUT baptism?  That would seem to be Unscriptural.  Thus, those who are not baptized, either with water, or blood, could not be amongst the saved.  Correct?

Read above.

While writing the above responses another pearl was dropped from Heaven and will gladly share it with those who will read this text.

If we limit ourselves to "Time Frame talk" we could say that all souls are born with the potential to go to Heaven, but through their actions, exercising their free will, they will fulfill the Eternal Frame destiny - Heaven or hell. We must remember - always - that the Redemption secured by Jesus is not a automatic pass to Heaven, as most Christians believe. His Act of Redemption gave us the opportunity to it - not the right to it.

I believe you covered predestination previously, but in light of / context of this latest document, a clarification on this point seems in order especially for those who may be introduced to The M+G+R Foundation via this document.

We will probably add this exchange at the end of the document in question since your point is very valid.

Once again, Thank you! for coming to the aid of your brothers and sisters - who needed the above clarification - by requesting it from us.
_____________________
(1) 
satan's Overall Game Plan or satan's Final Act
(2) At this time the count is over four billion people


From (Mrs.) AD @ USA - Published on July 21st, 2009 [Feast of Mary's Humility]

Good morning Miguel and all those involved in spreading  God's word!

In reference to the Did you know...? page posting of July 21st (1) about the mysterious, glowing clouds previously seen almost exclusively in Earth's polar regions which have appeared in the skies over the United States and Europe over the past several days....

I was wondering if it could have anything to do with the fact the earth could be entering into the Photon Belt?

I am searching for more information on that subject and would appreciate your input.
 
God bless... be safe!

(Mrs.) AD

A.
It could be that the Earth is entering the Photon Belt or any other natural cause that God uses to work His Miracles or Announce an event.

All (what we call) miracles have natural explanations which, in most cases, are beyond our comprehension until the time after we cross the veil.

God is indeed the Master of the Universe and Sovereign above all. Our experience has been that, when practical, He will adhere to the physical laws in working miracles and giving signs, but, when "push comes to shove" He can, and will, circumvent them.  For example - you may have read that miguel states, without a shred of a doubt, that the virginal birth of Jesus happened just that way. Mary's virginity was intact after the Divine birth. Why can he be so sure? after all, miguel was not there at the time.

It is because miguel has experienced/witnessed/lived through the circumvention of physical laws which would support such an event; an event which, to him and up to that point, was accepted as an act of Faith.

Thank you for the opportunity, dear A, to clarify this matter in a way that is applicable to all supernatural occurrences.... and I pray to God that is clear enough. When we try to bridge Time and Eternity frames of reference and/or Natural and Supernatural events, words simply fail me....
_____________________
(1)  Did you know that....? - July 2009


From (Mrs.) IW  @ Canada - Published on July 17th, 2009 [Feast of Mary's Humility]

In reference to the request for the mailing list confirmation e-mail you sent....

I do not always have access to a computer since I am trying to move to another state [state edited out].  Please keep me on the list.

Also dear family, my entire life is unraveling.

The Devil is turning every situation for the worst , so any prayers on our behalf will be appreciated.

Love to all of you.

(Mrs.) IW


A.
First of all, you may be assured of our prayers, but you must also remember the most effective way to deactivate satan's activities and influences in one's life....

Quoting from one of our documents (1) on suffering:

As part of the communications associated with Our Lady of the Rosary of Fátima the faithful were informed to offer to God, but to offer/accept any and all difficulties that we encounter in our daily lives for: Love of Jesus, in reparation for the offenses committed against the Immaculate Heart of Mary and for the conversion of poor sinners.

Why was this innocuous instruction and apparently "just another exercise of piety", as many would say, important enough for the Mother of God to personally deliver it to mankind?

This is why....

Whether satan likes it or not he must serve God, therefore, when he is harassing a soul (in a minor or major way) and we offer such prayer, unless God deems that we endure the harassment for our own benefit, satan will stop it on his own. Why?

The answer is quite simple (once it is understood, of course)....

If one turns around any misery that satan causes us, into a tool to Glorify God, to make reparation for the offenses committed against the Immaculate Heart of Mary and to convert sinners - one has "turned the tables" on him and he will cease and desist. The last thing he wants to do is to contribute to any of that.

Of course, if God deems that we endure it - we would not want it any other way, as we have explained in another document (2).

Therefore - offer that  prayer often, do what is in your hands (within reason) to resolve your situation and let God do the rest.

__________________________
(1)  Redemptive suffering - Part II
(2) 
Redemptive suffering - Part I


From M @ Canada - Published on July 12th, 2009

In reference to your latest document satan's Overall Game Plan or satan's Final Act (0)

When Israel was unfaithful, God sent plagues, destruction or captivity.

I was always under impression that when Catholic Church was unfaithful, God sent Mohammed which  developed in to heresy of Mohammedanism.

Now after reading your document it looks like I was wrong. I  always wondered why did God allow Abraham to sin with Hagar and produce a child, who was to live by the sword.

What is the purpose to allow two main religions? Is it to allow man a free choice, are there not enough other religions?

Please explain.

I do appreciate your teaching.

Thank you and God bless.

M

A.
Thank you for writing and raising very valid questions and help us illustrate the type of Evangelization the Roman Popes have engaged in.

You state: "
I was always under impression that when Catholic Church was unfaithful, God sent Mohammed which  developed in to heresy of Mohammedanism."

Yes, God allowed the Muslim world to be an instrument of His Divine Justice upon Christians, but He did not set up Islam for that purpose.

As you can read in our two documents
(1) which deal with Islam, the main faith related problem that Christianity has with Islam is that God has not allowed them to understand the Concept of the Trinity  - a Concept which we have, in His Name, explained (2)  to the world for the first time in the mid nineties.  We have written much about this and do not wish to repeat ourselves here, however, we encourage one and all to carefully review the already referenced (1)  documents.

What was the purpose of the two religions? That was not His original intent, God was trying to make up for the error caused by Abraham's lack of faith. If we had to condense the main message of God through the Prophet Mohammed was: A call to Christians to go back to the path marked by Jesus (and which they abandoned when Christianity became the Imperial Religion (3)) and a call to Jews to believe the Words of Jesus, accept them and live them.

Therefore - even though God was going to allow Islam to be an instrument of Divine Justice, He preceded it with yet another call back to the Gospel through the very instrument of said Divine Justice.

Once God had Blessed Abraham and made a promise regarding his descendants [Gen. 15:4-5], He could not take it back. Therefore, although Ismael was not the offspring that God had intended for Abraham (the offspring was to come from the union of Abraham and Sarah), God had to fulfill His promise also in Ismael since God does not speak nor promises in vain.

We trust that we have fully answered your question and, again, we wish to thank you since I have learned the above details as we sat down to respond to your letter. Such are the ways of God!
_______________________
(0)  satan's Overall Game Plan or satan's Final Act
(1)  The Foundation of Faith and The Muslim Corner
(2) The Secret Concept of the Holy Trinity
(3)  When and How Christianity became the Imperial Religion


From MD @ USA - Published on July 10th, 2009

Peace Miguel!

You may have already seen this World Net Daily article (1) but... It comes as no surprise to learn that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg thinks that the Roe ruling by the Supreme Court was to get rid of undesirables; to reduce the "...growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of...". But what is surprising is that she admits "the plan" so openly.

Either way — whether "our choice" or "their plan"— abortion continues to please Satan, no doubt.  If our bodies truly are temples in which God's Holy Spirit dwells, then the perpetual sacrifice of the unborn inside our bodies/temples (50M+ and counting) has got to be one of the most offensive sacrileges beneath heaven ever!

"It's my body, it's my choice" sounds like a good slogan for Satan doesn't it?  Too bad so many of the world's smartest people don't realize they are advertising for him!

God help us!!!  And may God continue to bless you and all you do,

MD


A.
There is no doubt that the spread of the almost drive trough window style practice of abortion has to be one of the greatest (temporary) triumphs of satan and that Justice Ginsburg considers herself squarely in the pro choice camp.

We have looked into this interview in detail since, in the past, we have caught WND engaging in "creative reporting" activities. Therefore, we went back to the yet unpublished interview (2) with the Justice in question.

As the original article states:
JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.
Acknowledging the sad fact that Ginsburg is pro abortion, her statement above - nor anything else that we have read in that interview -  indicate that she supports abortion to prevent the birth of undesirables. It looks that she - looking from the outside at the time (in 1973) - thought  that such was the objective of the Roe proponents,  not hers. At least that is what the article in question tells us; if she assumed that concept/idea as her own in another publication - that is another story.

She was born in 1933 and is a Jew. As a child and a pre teen she lived - from afar - the horrors of Nazism and the Final Solution for the "Jew problem". The chances of her supporting a Final Solution for another "ethnic or economic group problem" seem to be slim.

Regarding the slogan:  "It's my body, it's my choice"..... if someone wishes to cut off  his/her arm, or leg, etc. it should be their choice. An arm or leg cannot live separately from the body; but cutting off from one's body a human being that can indeed live separately from the body once developed, that is murder.

That is why it is imperative that we pray without ceasing for those who promote, facilitate and/or perform abortion. That IS a key response,  for,  didn't He say:

44 ....., Love your enemies: do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and calumniate you: 45 That you may be the children of your Father who is in heaven, who maketh his sun to rise upon the good, and bad, and raineth upon the just and the unjust.

46 For if you love them that love you, what reward shall you have? do not even the publicans this? 47 And if you salute your brethren only, what do you more? do not also the heathens this? 48 Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect.  [Matthew 5]

Also, by gently assisting them in seeing the situation from a different perspective, they may respond favorably and abandon such destructive ways.

For example.... Taking their mantra -
"It's my body, it's my choice" -  one step further....  If  such  concept rules, then any human being has the right to sell off an organ (donor for pay) without the laws interfering with it. Why, then, it is against the law to sell off one's body parts?

We thank you for bringing this situation to our attention.
____________________
(1) Article in question
(2) 
Original Article


From LP @ USA - Published on July 5th, 2009

In reference to the document (1) where you address
the persistent effort by public authorities to drum into the general population's psyche a latent panic about the influenza A(H1N1) (aka "swine flu") and its possible relation to the Mark of the Beast [Rev. 13:17] ....

For at least 10 years, since "Digital Angel"/ADSX and other companies have come up with human-implantable ID devices, there has been a lot of fear among conservative Christians that this device would be the Mark. In the past, you have downplayed that as the threat, and said that universal human tracking by "smart" cell phones was a greater problem. Has something changed to make an implantable chip the immediate danger?

It would seem to me that the indicators of the "Mark" would be the following:
 
(a) Implemented worldwide, on an emergency basis, associated with lots of propaganda to foster acceptance
(b) Acceptance would be compulsory; refusal would meet severe penalties
(c) Acceptance would mean making some type of knowing allegiance to the regime that is pushing the mark.
 
It also seems that the technical format of the Mark, and the conditions that lead to its implementation, will inevitably change as we get closer to the day of this implementation. As you have pointed out many times, as world conditions and human response to these conditions change, the strategy of those who want to give us the Mark would inevitably change.

LP

A.
We have used the "swine flu" created panic and the probable impending compulsory vaccination as a possibility but, more so, as an example of the conditions necessary to carry out said plan. You raise issue (c). i.e. acceptance would mean making some type of knowing allegiance to the regime that is pushing the mark which is indeed a very valid point. However, it could be seen from another perspective.

Those who are not to accept the Mark - in whichever final form it is manifested - will have the "eyes to see" and the "ears to hear" to recognize it for what it is and reject it. That is why we continue to remind all that we must rely more and more on the "internal radar" - the Holy Spirit of God - to guide our decisions and not by what our physical senses tell us.

As a parallel and partial example, and using you own (a), (b) and (c): A few days after President Bush II was inaugurated the "providential" plan (2) to counter what was going to take place almost nine months later (September 11, 2001) was released; (a) Once September 11, the required catalyst to spread countrywide panic panic, occurred, there were no objections to establish the draconian measures (3), spelled out in said "providential plan", for "the benefit of all"; (b) No exceptions were tolerated - all had to submit to the Patriot Act in its totality; and (c) Anyone in the US who would dare to denounce such measures would be considered unpatriotic - actually, quasi an "enemy combatant", thus, acceptance, by default, meant allegiance to the (Bush) regime.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to clarify this issue further.
___________________________
(1)  The possible mandatory flu vaccination and the mark of the beast
(2)  The "plan"
(3)  The draconian measures discussed by Lee Penn



From F. John Loughnan @ Australia - Published on July 1st, 2009

This message is forwarded to you as you have a file or files on your site which promotes or supports the false message that the Blessed Virgin Mary spoke at La Salette the words to Melanie Calvat: “ROME WILL LOOSE THE FAITH AND BECOME THE SEAT OF ANTICHRIST.”

I urge you to seriously ponder the measures you ought take to mitigate the damage caused by your stand on this matter

F. John Loughnan (1)

A. 
We are quite familiar with the concerted effort being made by the fanatic elements within the Faith to discredit the Message of La Salette (2) , the Messages through Montechiari and Fontanelle (Rosa Mystica) (3)  and the Messages of Garabandal. (4)  All three contain severe, and very accurate, criticism (5) of the members of the Clergy and Hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church.

What other behavior should we expect from men, and the supporters of those men, who have placed their ecclesiastical position and related comforts and benefits ahead of the well being of the flock - most specially the most vulnerable members of the flock: the children?

Who, in his right mind would expect, say, Cardinal Law (6) or Cardinal Egan (7), or Cardinal Mahoney or, for that matter, anyone in the Vatican who has allowed men of this caliber to remain in office, to endorse a Message from God, through His Mother, criticizing the debauchery of the clergy and their cover-up by the Hierarchy? Even the late Cardinal Spellman tried to torpedo the efforts of the Blue Army of Fatima but could not.

The M+G+R Foundation will not dignify such allegations against the Message of La Salette (2)  with an open debate. This issue will be laid to rest, once and for all, by the following statement from miguel de Portugal. (8)

Even if Melanie Calvat would rise from the dead and state that she invented the statement: “ROME WILL LOOSE THE FAITH AND BECOME THE SEAT OF ANTICHRIST”, I, miguel de Portugal, by the Grace of God and in His Name, proclaim from, and to, the four corners of the world that

Rome has indeed lost the Faith and has become the Seat of the AntiChrist  (9) 

In addition, regarding the statement about the mitigation of "...the damage caused by The M+G+R Foundation's stand on this matter." I pronounce, once more, that,  with the Canonization of Mr. Escrivá, (10)  any error that may inadvertently appear in the Domain of The M+G+R Foundation is minor when compared with the blasphemy of such perverted canonization (11)  forced upon John Paul II.

Of course, we are not surprised by such attacks to our publication of the truth about La Salette, after all L'Osservatore Romano confirmed such truth on 25th December, 1904:  

Melanie revealed her Secret at the time which was indicated to her, although she knew that such an action would draw towards her the wrath of those who having lost all moral sense were attached to the chariot of the Masonic sect.


_________________

(1)  F. John Loughnan
(2)  Message of La Salette
(3)  Rosa Mystica
(4)  Messages of Garabandal
(5)  Very accurate criticism
(6)  Cardinal Law
(7)  Cardinal Egan,
(8)  miguel de Portugal
(9)  Rome has indeed lost the Faith and has become the Seat of the AntiChrist
(10)  Canonization of Mr. Escriva
(11)  Perverted canonization




From JT @ USA - Published on June 28th, 2009

Although I haven't read all of your documents, your document on papal infallibility implys that the RC church teaches that all the decisions of the pope are supposed to be infallible. This is not the RC teaching, which is that only those pronouncements which were made ex cathedra are infallible.

If you disagree with some of these few ex cathedra statements, I would be interested in which ones.

You obviously agree with some, such as the Immaculate Conception, and since there are very few of these pronouncements, I'm not sure which you disagree with.

JT

A. Since you are the one who claims that we are in the wrong, please carefully review our document on Infallibility (1) and point out in detail where you think that we may have erred. It is you who must defend your claim.

In addition, you specifically asked: "If you disagree with some of these few ex cathedra statements, I would be interested in which ones." we will address that question now.

Any notion that the canonization of an individual falls under the infallible veil, we - in the Name of God - rebuke it.

Thank your for the opportunity to clarify this issue as well as the meaning of the Keys of the Kingdom. (2)
______________________
(1)  About Papal Infallibility
(2)  The Keys of the Kingdom



Past Private Forums

Private Forum - June 2009   and beyond

Last Public Forum - October 2007 - Edition Files




© Copyright 2009 - 2015 by The M+G+R Foundation. All rights reserved. However, you may freely reproduce and distribute this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without prior written consent; and (3) No charge is made for it.

The M+G+R Foundation
About Us and Frequently Asked Questions


PAGE of INTRODUCTION to DOMAIN

HOME PAGE

HOME PAGE - Español

HOME PAGE - Portugues

Back Up HOME PAGE


Our Research Department

To Search for Information Within Our Domain Click Here

Document Indexes: - Sorted by Title - Sorted by File Name


Future Use

Please Note: If the above dated image does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to view the original document.

If you wish to contact The M+G+R Foundation, please Click Here and follow the instructions.