2005

Other Years


PURPOSE

The purpose of this Public Forum is to publicly respond to correspondence that we may receive from time to time and which is of Universal interest in these very unsettling times.

We reserve the right to choose what questions to address and how to transcribe the question and/or statement from the correspondence received. The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential except in the case of abusive correspondence which will then be referred to the appropriate responsible entities.





From JM @ USA

Q.  Greetings:

I went to Mass Saturday evening for the Vigil for Sunday. I was watching carefully to be sure that all the vessels on the altar containing the bread and wine to be offered were beneath the priest's hands as he performed the Transubstantiation..

I believe I saw that after Father transubstantiated the bread and wine in the vessels before him Deacon P went into the (place where the Blessed Sacrament reposes-also a pass-through to the preparation area behind the altar), remove two gold bowls and placed them among the others on the altar. The contents were then part of what was offered to those receiving The Holy Eucharist.

My question is this: Does the bread remain in the "Form" (of Our Lord) even though it may be unused for a particular Mass and brought out at a later time or need it be transubstantiated for each Mass?

JM


A.  Yes. The Eucharistic Presence of Our Lord continues to Be. However, there seems to be a problem with that practice.

First of all - In accordance to the Vatican Rules, most of the consecrated hosts given in a particular Mass should have been consecrated in that same Mass, except when conditions simply prevent it, such as: Mass in St. Peter's Square or the esplanade before the Basilica of Fátima and the like. Even though thousands of hosts are consecrated then, the officiating minister must rely on previously consecrated hosts for the communion of hundreds of thousands of communicants.

Nevertheless, what concerns us the most is that we are witnessing the practice that you have reported in far too many Masses where there is no need to do so unless, of course, "the need" is to feed the Faithful unconsecrated host. This, of course, would be in keeping with the times that we are living through. What better way for satan to mount a full and final assault on those who try to remain strengthened by and through the Bread of Heaven than by spiritual starving them?

Most homilies have become completely worthless; therefore, if to that absence you add the withholding of the True Bread of Heaven... then, what is that you have left? Nothing! - excpet the ever-present collection plate.

Our advice from here - and regardless who may get upset, the Roman Curia included - is: (1) Attend Mass where you can be sure that the consecration is being done properly; and (2) That most hosts used in communion were consecrated right at that Mass and before you own eyes.

Frankly - with some notable exceptions - we have very little trust in the integrity of those who today claim to be Shepherds for God's people. As the saying goes in the U.S. - we must all act as if we were from Missouri.





From JB @ USA

Q.  I believe there may be an error in Volume II (Lenten Season), Page 976, in Second Reading in a Treatise by St. Basil. In the last sentence of this reading the last words read "---we become God". This troubles me as I believe this is New Age philosophy.

I realize that we are created in the image of God and also become Christ-like, but NEVER GOD. To my knowledge there is only one God, my Father and Creator, and Him alone do I serve, not serve myself.

I e-mail one popular Catholic ministry who has a Bible Institute only to be told that I took this out of context. How do you take something out of context when they capitalized the word "God"? Only God Himself receives that honor and right.

If you believe this is in error, could you please direct me as to how to have it corrected. I have heard this kind of teaching in our local church and feel extremely uncomfortable about it.

JB


A.  Error? It is Blasphemy! Who Is Like Unto God? You have every reason to feel uncomfortable about it. It is not of God.

We have have just published an eight page document addressing this and other related issues which continue to erode the little Faith left while opening the doors for the manifestation of the False Christ.





From MV @ USA

Q.  In reference to the "Man vs Man" article posted on 6-11-05 - it appears more than coincidence, and more of a phenomenon of synchronicity in my case that just last week I started to read an old book of mine left unread for years that deals with the topic:

Thank you for considering my message.

M V


A.  We have heard of that book as well as about Dr. Ross, thus we are glad to post the above report for the other visitors to The M+G+R Foundation Domains.

For a series of unusual current Geophysical and Astronomical events taking place in our world and its surroundings Click Here. God contiues to give His children signs. Unfortunately, it is usually too late when we realize it and act upon them.





From JM @ USA

Q.  Dear Sirs:

Recently I examined the several articles listed in EWTN's Documents Listing concerning various subjects re: Opus Dei.

Each one supports the successes as Opus Dei has risen in the Hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church and glows with seeming self-satisfaction.

I must admit I find it discouraging that "no ear seems to hear nor tongue to speak" that there may be an undercurrent of motive deeper than the
unformed Catholic may see or understand.

JM


A.  We received your communication as a notice from God to speak about that subject matter at once without further delay - and that we will.

miguel de Portugal, before and after "he was", was a strong supporter of EWTN, by word, T-shirt wearing and financially. He corresponded with Mother Angelica frequently, received everything they published, secured video tapes of key special programs and showed them to others, promoted them within whatever Catholic Community he was associated with at the time, etc.

Through a series of highly unprobable circumstances - also known as Divine Providence - m de P was given a solid gold rosary by the most unlikely benefactor (that story, in itself is most interesting). The immediate thought and action was to send it to M. Angelica for her nuns to utilize it when praying in the presence of the Blessed Sacrament - he certainly did not need a solid gold rosary to pray with! It was graciously received by Mother Angelica and, as such, acknowledged.

He drove to the original EWTN location to visit it and the monastery, attended Holy Mass, prayed the Holy Rosary, etc.. He "felt" that all was good indeed (Incidentally, in the same trip he visited Caritas of Birmingham and he "felt" that is was bad - Caritas NOT Medjugorje)

Back in Nazaré, Portugal, he wrote Mother Angelica asking/discusssing with her why they were not broadcasting radio and/or TV worldwide - that he felt that it was sorely needed. M. Angelica wrote back saying that she wished to do so but did not have the means. We then agreed on "Oremus..." for it.

During these few years of bliss between m de P and EWTN, one Holy Week Mother Angelica wrote (no form letters) to let him know that the nuns were be praying specifically for him and the work he was conducting for the Glory of God, before the Blessed Sacrament during the Easter Tridium.

By this time m de P was noticing something amiss with H.H. John Paul II pastoral trips turned into media jamborees as well as with the Marian Movement of Priests.

His relationship with M. Angelica was such that he wrote to her confiding his concerns to her - especially about the papal media jamborees. Never, ever heard form her or EWTN again. Not even received the automatically addressed monthly newsletters. It was the END of "the Christian love affair".

Shortly thereafter money "appeared" for world wide TV and radio transmission of EWTN programs and for a new monastery. She seems to have been shipped away with her nuns to said monastery to keep her disconnected from the ministry that lived on because her but was no longer hers - just like the fate suffered by H.H. John Paul II.

Dear brother, you seem to have Eyes to See and Ears to Hear and the ability to discern how the wool is being pulled over the eyes of "the unformed Catholics".





From LR @ USA

Q.  I went to a funeral of a friend that was in the Episcopal Church. This was my first time.

I was surprised to see how their celebration look so much like our Mass. They even had some of the same prayers and songs. The most touching moment to me was when the pastor invited all to receive communion.

What he said was, "All are welcomed to receive. They only requirement is Baptism." It truly made me see how arrogant the Catholic Church is to deny anyone communion. Here it was offered to me in a different church and I was struck with the feeling/knowledge that my Lord was present to me in another place of worship.

This is truly a terrible time in the earth when men of the church believe they can deny Christ to the people. Christ comes to us anyway.

LR


A.  It is indeed a terrible time in the earth and that is precisely while God will have to directly intervene as He did during Noah's time.

Mary came a number of times to make up for the deficiencies in the Evangelization of the Church Her Son established. Her messages were ignored. God allowed the bloodiest century in the history of mankind - the 20th Century - in the hopes that the pain was enough so that the "deaf would hear" and He would not have to increase it further.

He was mocked and continues to be mocked by what we now call - The Vatican Circus. Logically, this time, the "volume" will be higher and the pain will be global and far greater than in the 20th Century.

Regarding the statement made by the Episcopal priest officiating the funeral you attended to, we have to make a clarifying point.


The one event that would decelerate the descent of the world into the abyss, would be to nourish the searching souls with the bread of Heaven - the Most Holy Eucharist. Yet, this Divine and Healing Bread Form Heaven is being denied by the Church Administrators on grounds which are not Scriptural - for He came to heal the sick not those who are well.

In this time of International Courts of Laws bringing current and former government officials to justice for having committed genocide (*) and fanning the flames of hate, were there enough time left, we would call for an International Tribunal to try the Administration of the Roman Catholic Church - NOT the Catholic Faith, but its Historical Administrators, past and present - for Crimes Against Humanity, with a spiritual component, the unjustified withholding of the only Supernatural remedy to the misery of man - the Bread From Heaven.

Unfortunately (yes, we said "unfortunately") for them there is not enough time left and the level of Justice that will be dispensed by God upon them for their betrayal, will far surpass anything that man could have ruled.






From The M+G+R Foundation @ European Union & USA

Q.  On the June 7th posting at our Points to Ponder section we posed the following question:



A.  An individual who received a mailing from us containing pretty much the same question, and who is well qualified to answer it, was kind enough to do so. We secured said individual's permission to reproduce the letter while keeping it completely anonymous as to not interfere with said individual's work in the area in question (*).

The letter:



What can we add to that other than to ask each one of you to please pray for this individual and others in the same painful situation ("I cannot stand knowing what I know") - whether clergy or laity. These are the ones who are truly part of the remnant - they have Eyes to See and Ears to Hear.





From JH @ Ireland

Q.  The following websites seem to be linked to your posting on oxytocin and seem to tie in in with New World Religions.

Again it seems that some of the groups are "hiding" right in front of us.

Hope these may be of some use.

Yours in Christ.

JH


A.  [JH is referring to the posting date June 4th in our News Commentary section entitled: "Trust me! I am a hormone" -- A hormone that makes people trust you..]

First of all, Thank you! for a very valuable contribution to all!

We have visited the sites mentioned in your letter The Hedonistic Imperative - Heaven on Earth? and The Oxytocin Garden of Eden. Your evaluation is right, tragically right. "They" have already reached the "working" level of even substituting the fulfillment of the First and Second Commandments, feeling of Love for God and each other, a Love that only God can bestow on us, with a drug induced "Love".

This is not just a "foot print" of the False Christ in the making, it has its "fingerprints": The falsification of a condition only naturally attainable through God. Indeed it is an integral part of the False Dawn which Lee Penn has just exposed to the world in minute detail - Thanks be to God!

You obviously have Eyes to See. We pray to God that our brethren out there now fully understand the imperative need to seek those Eyes to See - something that truly God is the Only One Who can grant. Drugs cannot induce that.

We also pray to God that every one who sees this posting shares it far and wide because this is already taking place with other perception altering drugs and psyco-techniques - it is most evident in the political arena. So evident, yet unseen, that it always surprises us when we see proof of it although we are fully aware of it.

We take this opportunity to recommend to our readers to review the exposé of the fabled New Age that we published some time ago.





From Initials Withheld @ Withheld

Q.  Part I

Your quote...


Which of course is where my head is at, and where I struggle with my own questionable actions and 'morality'.

Part I I

I also have to confess that I find it..... unsettling..... that I have a reasonable amount of contact with a guy (you) who claims he talks to God more regularly than anyone else has before, so why do I have that contact, to what purpose. Plenty of people out there claiming the same thing, but for some reason I listen to you. And why are my views of any interest to you. All thought provoking stuff.

So, thank you for your response recently.

[Initials Withheld]


A. Part I

The moment one recognizes that one's actions are of questionable morality and is searching for a solution - there is no denial. Denial is either wanting to be blind to a situation; or justifying the morality of what an action which is clearly not. You do not "qualify" as being in denial - on the contrary.

Part I I

Who did Jesus talk with? Who had access to Him? Those the Father chose. If it was "good enough" for Jesus" it certainly will be "good enough" for miguel de Portugal who is not even fit to untie His sandal strap.

When man tries his best to serve God, then it must be always God's choice and not man's as it usually is under the guise of being God's Will. You have not experienced (yet?) the situation when God says "Enough!" direct contact. When He does, that access is shut down. You are right - technically there are over 6 billion of you out there and all are children of God - the ONLY Creator.

Why are your views and comments of interest to us to the point of frequently publishing them? Quite simple! They are of universal nature and interest - hundreds of millions of our brethren face the same confusing crossroads and, those who are searching, have the same questions and concerns. Thus our answers and comments are for all.

We pray that we have "provoked enough constructive thought" to all!





From AM @ Melbourne, Australia

Q.  Hello, fellow brother in Christ!

Notwithstanding Church protocols in these matters, do you believe Pope John Paul 11 is a saint?

God bless you and your labours,

AM


A. We have just published a document which may answer your question in full.



If any questions and/or doubts remain, please visit our Research Department





2005

Other Years



© Copyright 2005 by The M+G+R Foundation. All rights reserved. However, you may freely reproduce and distribute this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without prior written consent; and (3) No charge is made for it.