The M+G+R Foundation
The purpose of this Private Forum is to share with
members of our Mailing List the response to and/or
comment of correspondence
that we may receive from time to time and which is of Universal
in these very unsettling times. Each List Member, may, at his/her
discretion, share this page with others.
We reserve the right to choose what
questions to address and how to
transcribe the question and/or statement from the correspondence
The identity of the correspondent will be kept confidential except in
case of abusive correspondence which will then be referred to the
Letters/Questions - Addressed on
and November 2007
Note: If you believe that you are in our
Mailing List and are not
receiving any mailings, please let us know and we will advise you what
may be the problem and how to correct it. If you are not in our
Main Mailing List and wish to be added to it, do
From YdM @ USA -
on November 29th, 2007
read the following announcement for your discernment and comments.
Oprah Winfrey will be letting out all the stops on
her XM Satellite Radio program this coming year. Beginning January 1, 2008, Oprah & Friends will offer a year-long course on the New Age teachings of A Course in Miracles. A lesson a day throughout the year will completely cover the 365 lessons from the Course in Miracles Workbook
we have stated before (1),
the spiritual/supernatural domain has laws just as the physical domain
does. [We are referring to natural laws like the law of gravity
and not civil laws.]
If one gains knowledge of certain spiritual/supernatural laws one can start working
miracles (2) - how else do you think the practitioners of the
occult work their miracles? [Remember that Pharaoh's magicians could
turn their staffs into snakes.- Exodus 7:11]
The problem lies in the fact that if we attempt to work miracles
"outside God", that is, not in accordance to His Will, there will be a
high price to be paid.
Why? First, we are trying to "play God". Second, we infer that we know
what, and when, is really best and God does not. In either case - we
drift away from God's Protective Wing (3) and when we do so we become easy pray for satan and
We ask two questions to illustrate one example: Which is the reputed
center of voodoo practitioners? Haiti. What is the condition of Haiti -
financially, political and socially? The worse in the Americas and even
rivaling the other poorest nations of the world.
miguel knows well many of those spiritual/supernatural laws and, many
years ago, God tested him regarding what he would do with that
knowledge. Through His Grace miguel would not take advantage of them
for, through that same Grace, miguel knew that whatever we ask of God
with a sincere heart and truly defer to His Will it would be granted -
or a better equivalent - at the perfect time and at no cost.
We think that the above have clarified our position regarding A Course of Miracles and any other
New Age (5) gimmick.
We thank you for the opportunity.
dangers of false
(4) The New Age
movement is not just a harmless fad
From IC @
on November 25th, 2007 [Feast of Christ The King]
recently mentioned that "...we should not comparing ourselves with
others; we must only keep our eyes fixed on those Heavenly Set
My question is: While we strive to be as close to Christ (i.e. perfect)
as is humanly possible, is it not appropriate that we look upon others
(say, such as St. Don Bosco) as signposts to our ultimate goal?
The purpose is not to be that person's clone, as circumstances
and/or God-given abilities differ for each person, but rather to
remind ourselves what is possible when we put our faith in God.
I do this from time to time: aside from asking myself what Jesus would
want me to do, I also look upon others for inspiration. Is this
Also, I hope God will allow you to one
day share those examples of Miguel's you mentioned. I am
certain that many would benefit, myself included.
May God continue to bless and guide
A. No. To look at others for inspiration - that is, as a
reminder that "With the help of
God all is possible even for humans." is not wrong.
To use an image representing say, Jesus, as a meditative focal point
for a prayer is not wrong either. What happens is that most
will slip into idolatry without realizing it. This occurs when no
longer any image of Jesus would serve as an adequate focal point for
prayer - they suddenly "just need" a particular "miraculous image"....
and Presto! ... they have fallen into full fledged idolatry (1).
When man starts focusing too much on a Saint - say, John Bosco (2) - as a reminder that "With the help of God all is possible even
for humans." soon enough man will start shifting his focus from
Jesus to the favorite Saint in question and Presto!... they have fallen
into idolatry too.
Man is too prone to slip into whatever is wrong, therefore, we must, at
all times, avoid situations which have been proven risky and
About miguel's examples to share.... Although it would give us great
joy.... it may be not possible for now due to time limitations.... This
letter which we are now addressing was sent to us August 31st, 2006
- over one year ago! - and, as important as it is, we had not been able
to address it yet.
This embarrassment comes after sending a letter of apology to a
collaborator from the Ukraine who had written to us on January 2007
with a very important question/concern and we had mis filed it -
thus, remains still unanswered and, as we just said, he is one of the
very, very, very few collaborators that we have.
On the positive side - we cannot be accused of favoritism....
Obviously we do not have much time to spare and, since "the infallible
ones" (3) reside in Vatican City, we do make mistakes. We pray
and trust that Christ the King (4), Whom we strive to serve as only He deserves, makes
up for miguel's miserable human limitations.
shining example of
(4) If the New Age
movement were to dethrone Christ the King,
who would take His place?
From M&P S @
on November 22nd, 2007 [U.S. Thanksgiving Day]
As you know, the Jehovah's Witnesses are forbidden by their beliefs
from accepting blood transfusions - even in death threatening
That may be well for adults who should be fully conscious of their
actions but, what about minors? Children who are not even mature
enough to understand the faith they may die for?
Should physicians do it anyway overruling the legal guardians of the
Should the law of the land forbid it?
We would appreciate your views since this is an issue we hear about in
portugal quite frequently.
A. Frankly, the question has
stumped us since a law forbidding this practice would appear to be a
clear civil interference with religious freedom - even when minors are
We were stumped until God shed
light on the issue, that is.
An adult cannot be forbidden by law to commit suicide, however, when
the life of a minor is at stake the situation changes. Would the law of
any civilized country allow the sacrifice of children to the deity of
the parents/townspeople choice? Of course not!
Would the law of any civilized country allow the sacrifice of an adult
to the deity of their choice? Of course not - if someone else is
"handling the death blow"; that would be murder. However,
the adult is free to climb to the edge of a volcano and dive in - head
first - as an offering to his/her god.
Therefore - imposing rules - any rules - on minors, or adults who are
not in full possession of their mental faculties, which will cause
their death is murder. The precedent is set as we showed above.
As if that precedent was not sufficient - the "....just because the Bible says so and I
believe it so I will do it...." (1) justification does not
authorize behavior that may be contrary to the "laws and/or customs of
the land". What happens to those who claim that polygamy is Biblical
and they will practice it on religious grounds? Most likely they will
end up in jail as we have recently seen with Mr. Warren Jeffs in the
Let us now act and pray
so that the above presented solution be implemented.
(1) About Biblical
Literalism and Symbolism Part I
and Part II
From JM @ US -
on November 21st, 2007 [Mary's Presentation]
May the Countenance of Our Lord shine
upon you and all who read these remarks this All Souls' Day Friday...
tells me to write a few lines to you this Friday afternoon as I think
about my faith and how I have fallen short of my own expectations in
I think about the careless handling at Holy Mass of the species which
become the Body and Blood of Our Lord only
when the proper formulae and invocations are performed specifically to
include all the patens and ciboria to be used in THAT PARTICULAR
as you have amply explained (1)
. I think about how the
current practice today seems to
be "if we
consecrated a Host at a previous Mass, then it's acceptable to re-use
again whether we include it under the hands of the celebrant or not"
and how a certain Father told me "you'll just have to trust us."
I felt prompted to reflect with
you on these topics as I reacted to today's "Points To Ponder"
(November 2nd) regarding all those who march to Holy Communion without
regard for the purity of their souls or who feel the need for the
Sacrament of Reconciliation as a required precursor to a worthy
reception of The Eucharist. Most specially those self assured
"Catholics" who consider themselves worthy to touch the Precious
Substance as Eucharist Ministers or those who partake in the "communion
in hand" method. In my humble opinion every person who touches
should be required to have a priest hear his confession or be granted a
think about all these things when a priest tells me that attending Mass
is the most important single act of worship an individual may
perform. I wonder if it is a "True Mass" - as we expect it to be - but
and questioning it in ways I mention above. Logically, following that
greatest sin might then be considered to be "the sin of missing Mass".
Priests more and more seem to be focusing on missing or attending Mass
as the single defining characteristic of "a good and faithful
I happen to feel that if I miss Mass I need to make a Reconciliation
before I can receive the Host in good conscience. Then, I can say, I
Mass more often than I would like but the every time I "miss Mass..
confession" keeps me away more often than not.
So while I may seem to be on a treadmill of sorts, I
feel I have described the condition of what many priests would call
"unmotivated Catholics" and a condition that troubles many of us but
find ourselves "caught in" nonetheless.
point in my writing on these subjects is because I feel that many
Catholics have concerns in the same areas and an encouragement
can share and reflect together and strengthen our faith in the sharing
of personal experiences under the discerning eye of miguel de
Portugal and the Holy
A. We will start our response with a series of New
Testament readings since the straight forward Word of the Living God
surpasses any human doctrine.
Jesus did not warn us about, and teach us, the following for no reason:
they bind heavy and insupportable burdens, and lay them on men's
shoulders; but with a finger of their own they will not move them. [Matthew 23:4]
Woe to you scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites; because you go round about the sea and the land to make one
proselyte; and when he is made, you make him the child of hell twofold
more than yourselves. [Matthew
Woe to you scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites; because you make clean the outside of the cup and of the
dish, but within you are full of rapine and uncleanness. [Matthew 23:25]
whosoever shall do the will of my Father, that is in heaven, he is my
brother, and sister, and mother. [Matthew 12: 50]
Jesus said to him: Thou shalt love
the Lord thy God with thy whole heart, and with thy whole soul, and
with thy whole mind. [Matthew
The "motor" that should move us in
every aspect of our lives is the love of God; a love with thy whole heart, and with thy whole
soul, and with thy whole mind.
Thus we should strive for such
state by asking Him in prayer.
Love for God, as you know, is not purchased "at the Mall". As
the love for God increases in our hearts, we will become more of
Jesus' "...brother, and sister, and
That is - His real family. It then logically follows
that we will love our neighbor as ourself. It is impossibly to truly
love God and not "love thy neighbor
As we become His real family, we will automatically strive to keep the
inside of "....the cup and of
even cleaner than the outside. We do not need to
impress anyone - we just need to please God.
Simultaneously with all of this, the desire to partake of the Sacrifice
of the Mass, will increase until, state-in-life and/or other
circumstances permitting, the last thing that one will want to miss on
any day would then be Holy Mass. For those whose state-in-life and/or
circumstance are prevented from frequenting Mass, then the real
sacrifice to be offered to God is precisely not being able to
of the mysteries of the Holy Mass on a frequent basis.
Therefore - the "Motor" to drive us to Mass is simply our love for God
and love for our neighbors (3)
For example: We say "no to abortion" - under any circumstance - not
doctrine; not because of the law; not because of appearances, but
because our love for God.
We strive not to sin in the least bit, not because we are holy and good
(only God is holy and good); we do so out of not wanting to grieve Whom
we love so much and harm our neighbor - who we also love. What
sets the children of God apart
is that we admit our inclination to sin - while most others deny (4)
When we admit it, we have His assistance (5)
to avoid sin and stay
close to "Home"; when we deny it
we surely fall.
We trust that we have answered your concerns and questions - even those
which were not asked - in full.
We thank you for the opportunity to serve Him in spite of our great
thy neighbor" does not mean that one most like one's neighbor or want
to be friends with him/her. "Love thy neighbor" is to desire upon your
neighbor all the good from God that you desire for yourself.
participation in the redemption of mankind
dangers of denial
is one step at a time... while holding the Hand of God.
From RC @ US -
on November 17th, 2007 [Mary, Mother of Divine Providence]
Today's readings [Luke 17: 26-37] remind us that it was
"business as usual" for most at the time of Noah and Lot.
However, not everyone was swept up in the fashion of the times,
certainly not Noah and Lot.
I am sure that many felt that Noah and Lot had bumped their heads
when they "fell off the turnip truck."
Indeed, it must have appeared that each lived an "alternate
As you have pointed out, when you pray and do God's will, He
showers you with Graces so that it becomes easy for you to see what
others cannot even imagine. Best of all, you no longer have to
"believe" that this is reality, you know that you are living reality.
The Kingdom of God is not for all. He offers it only to
those who have listened and followed the Word of God.
At some point, as it rained and flooded, or as fire and brimstone
fell from the sky, the jokes about Noah and Lot were a lot less funny.
But, that was of no concern to Noah and Lot who were on their way
We are all with you, Miguel. We are aware of what is to
and continue to pray that God gives you the wisdom, patience and
courage in the days ahead.
Your kind words Glorify God Whom miguel strives to serve as He deserves
and in spite of his many limitations.
You have heard us say many times that we have not learned in 6,000
years. What makes it even worse is that we keep making the same
mistakes over and over again - that is how stupid man, without God, is.
When God revealed to miguel [in 1991 - 1992 time frame] what eventually appeared in the Sequence
of Events, (1) He also communicated to miguel that: (a) Initially most will consider him
insane - starting with the prophecy of Step No.1; and that (b) It would indeed take the
fulfillment of Step No.1, for those who need to wake up and
listen, to realize that all
else in the Sequence will also come to pass.
miguel could logically be considered functioning as Nostradamus in reverse as we have
explained elsewhere. It is very easy to write almost intelligible
quatrains and let those who come behind try to fit them with what would
happen in the ensuing 500 years. The "proof of the pudding", as it is
said in the U.S., is to announce 16-20 years in advance that:
of the errors spread by (Soviet) Russia, a nuclear attack is initiated
against the United States of America and other nations of the Western
China will play a major role. This will lead to a worldwide and
conflagration of devastating magnitude.
a. Nations will be annihilated as
it was specifically
by the Blessed Virgin
in Fátima, Portugal, in 1917.
b. Godlessness [this is a more comprehensive term than
engulf the world and the Church will be ruthlessly and brutally
with the objective of destroying it.
[Luke 21:9-10, Joel 1:5-7, 10-12, 19-20, Revelations 18:2-20]
is the only way (2)
those who need to respond - and believe -
will realize that it was them who were living an alternate reality and
not miguel de Portugal.
We continue to pray for a Green Apocalypse; that is, pleading with God
so that most of the Divine Justice is dispensed through natural
disasters - floods, earthquakes, hurricanes and comets - and not
through the massive use of nuclear weapons. Oh, yes - we will not
escape the consequence of the use of nuclear weapons since prophecy
will be fulfilled; however, technically it could be reduced to only one
or two major ones.
We are at peace - All have been adequately warned (3) considering the lack of backers that we
have had in 16 years and continue to not have.
(1) The Sequence
(2) Divine Mercy in
All Have Been
From BK @
on November 13th, 2007
I have a question regarding validly consecrated Hosts.
We have a 5 pm Mass on Sundays as our parish is the designated
"Parish" for our Vicariate.
I was at Church prior to the designated time for the Mass. At
about 5:05 it was apparent to me that there was no priest for this Mass
(the Pastors of the churches in our Vicariate rotate taking turns to
serve this Mass. Our Pastor of this particular church was of
course, nowhere to be found, but that's another story). The Mass
coordinator announced that there was to be a Communion Service with
Consecrated Hosts taken from the Tabernacle.
Now is where it gets tricky!
My children (aged 15 and 19) were at the 5pm Vigil Mass on
Saturday. There were three little girls making their First Holy
Communion. The celebrant of this Mass called the little girls up
onto the Altar. At the end of the Consecration, when the priest
elevates the Body and Blood, he stopped and gave each of the girls a
platter of Hosts and instructed them to elevate as he did.
I have knowledge of what occurred yesterday. Was I in error to
not partake of the Communion service as I question the validity of the
Consecrated Hosts in the Tabernacle? Or am I a Pharisee and am I
May God continue to bless you in all you do for His glory!!
Confusion continues to reign amongst the shepherd and what you report
in your letter is one more example of it. We understand that by
"the Elevation" you meant during the final doxology ("Through Him, with
Him, in Him. . . ) and then the Great Amen.
First of all, the priest should not have involved the girls in what is
strictly a priestly function. He is giving erroneous signals to
the children and adults alike.
Second - We feel that the real symbolism of this second elevation is
the priestly offering of the Sacrificial Lamb to the Father as the
perfected offering as opposed to what used to be done under the Old
Testament. At that time, the sacrificed animal was slaughtered, then
offered to God and then eaten by the Faithful.
Even in pagan rituals, the food is first offered to the idol in
question and then the idolaters eat the food.
We feel that there is more than enough reason to disqualify the
offering that priest made. If the priest performed the consecration
, then the species were the Body and Blood of Jesus
Christ - but the final step to validate the Eucharist Offering must be
precisely the offering of the Sacrificial Lamb to the Father by the
priest and, in this case, some were not.
Regarding your reaction - If you felt that it was wrong to consume one
of those hosts you acted correctly, but if you had, out of ignorance,
you would not have offended God although the validity of that communion
would have been doubtful.
I would have recommended not to partake of the communion on the basis
of endorsing scandalous behavior at the altar; i.e. not having the
priest presenting (elevating) the offering to the Father.
Therefore it is our opinion that you acted correctly "on all fronts".
Conducting a valid Consecration
From VdP @
on November 9th, 2007
In reference to the mail out (1) by the American Family Association:
"Federal government tells 85-year-old grandmother not to put an angel
on Christmas tree".
I do not know how the law would apply
in this case, but it looks to me that somebody might be forgetting the
constitutional right to free expression. The management of the HUD
complex may not be able to place religious signs or symbols, but a
private citizen like the lady in question has the right to do so
anywhere, provided she does not offend any of her neighbors who share
the area outside her door.
I live in one such HUD unit and if the
management told me I could not place a sign or symbol outside my
door claiming it is a "commons area", I will then tell them
who sweeps and maintains that area and who walks through it.
Those of you who might know the law,
please tell me if I am right.
As you know, we do not give legal advice. We try to strictly
adhere to: Render therefore to Caesar the things that
are Caesar's; and to God, the things that are God's.
Therefore, we will address the part of the issue that you have raised
up which is of God.
Invoking the same source - the Holy Word of God - we call your
not two sparrows sold for a farthing? and not one of them shall fall on
the ground without your Father. But the very hairs of
your head are all numbered. Fear not therefore: better are you than
many sparrows. Every one
therefore that shall confess me before men, I will also confess him
before my Father who is in heaven. But he that shall deny me before men, I
will also deny him before my Father who is in heaven. [Matthew 1: 29-33]
Therefore no HUD regulation could be passed and upheld
unless God would allow it. Then, when God allows something that
in the surface appears to the world as bad, we must ask ourselves why
has He allowed it.
The celebration of the Birth of Our Savior - Christmas - has become an
orgy of consumerism, fountain of family discord and source of
indebtedness beyond the means of the individuals. Sixty years ago, the
gift giving and receiving was already the central theme of said
celebration - and not the Birth of Christ. Now, of course, it has
reached the point where we have heard many people actually curse
Christmas because it has become such "a pain in the neck" in all
All of this, of course, offends God greatly. Therefore, for the benefit
of our soul since....
I say to thee, thou shalt not go out from thence till thou repay the
last farthing. [Matthew
...the best thing to do is to stop us from offending Him.
The best way to stop us from offending Him is to block whatever we do
which causes the offense - thus, the way the world has been celebrating
Christmas is being blocked with God's Blessing.
It is really that simple.
We thank you for the opportunity to set the record straight.
We will forward the referred to mailing upon request.
From KD @
on November 8th, 2007
in 2007 you
mentioned in one of your communications that you are praying that
everybody will be spiritually prepared for what will happen during this
Are you at liberty to explain more fully what you meant by that
As always, may God continue to bless your work.
The answer/explanation to that statement may be found
within a document (1)
(and links from it)
which we re issued today after enhancing the information/links
contained in it, as well as on the Public Forum posting From LP
on January 20th]. (2)
From secondary sources: If one carefully reviews the unfiltered - but
level headed - news throughout the globe: political, natural phenomena,
social and financial, one may see that the Apocalypse is already well
underway for many, many people. Once Step No. 1 (3)
then it will be like a world wide roller coaster ride until the End of
(1) About National Security
(2) Public Forum
- January 2007
(3) The Sequence of
From RC @
on November 5th, 2007
Note from The M+G+R
Foundation: To assist the
reader in maintaining the focus on the Question and Answer fro each
point raised we will respond within the text of RC.
Is it true that after a life
is completed, He will step in at the
last moment for everyone and give them a warning and more important, a
chance to change, or is it too late? That is, like THE WARNING?
A. As we illustrated (1) - we were addressing those who may have not known
Jesus Christ through no fault of their own. Those who have chosen to
Him or refuse His Word, will have much to suffer after body-sould separation
(Purgatory) if they were indeed marked for Heaven. (2)
Q. I guess I am always
hopeful about the unfathomable Mercy of God, but as you have pointed
out, even God has limits on His Mercy.
A. The entire Old Testament and the Book of
the Apocalypse graphically shows that God is indeed slow to anger but
His patience has limits. His Mercy (3) has no limits to those who appeal to it
with sorrowful and contrite heart - although some purifying suffering
Q. Regarding our
"mistakes" in life: I have gotten the
impression that not all bad things happen because someone did something
wrong. I see this in medicine all the time. That is, you do
always get what you deserve. Sometimes you have good health
act of you own. Similarly, you may have poor health but it is not
fault. More often, you do everything wrong and do not die or even
A. In each case that we have reviewed that
appears to exemplifies what you relate above, we have been able to find
the "hand of man" behind every misery.
Also, it is frequently (so as not to
say "always") the case that when "...you do everything wrong and do not
die or even get
sick." that soul is destined for hell. Remember - Pain is the
megaphone that God uses for the deaf to hear (4) ; thus, if an individual needs not to hear
Him, why inflict pain? God does not like to inflict pain. We
force His hand every time.
Q. Jesus was condemned to
death because of a "mistake" in the justice system of the time,
but it was part of the
A. No; there was no mistake in the Temple
Master's Justice System. He was a threat to their Godless way of
life. His crucifixion indeed was part of the plan of Salvation: God
allowed the sin of Judas Iscariot (5) to be combined with the sins of the
Temple Masters to produce the desired results - the opportunity for Salvation
for mankind. That is why we often repeat that even satan has to
I am reluctant to say that a person who is most holy and
passes through life without pain and suffering and makes no mistakes.
In fact, someone once observed that God does wonderful things with
civil injustice and mistakes.
A. We addressed that in the above remarks.
Q. On the other hand, I
suppose you could argue that if one was
perfect, there would be no mistakes and things would still
have gotten accomplished, but with less pain and suffering.
A. Taking the characteristics of the soul to
perfection (which of course, is never achieved) - as "perfection" is
approached there would be less necessary pain and suffering for the benefit of
said soul but that same individual may accept joyfully much suffering
for the benefit (6) of other souls.
Q. This is probably not
important in the end, but I was just thinking. Again, I
appreciate you pointing me in the right direction.
A. Well - technically it is "not important in
the end" since "in the end" it would be too late already to minimize
earthly (7) and purgatorial suffering.
Men and Angels
Time and Eternity
(3) The Unfathomable Mercy of
(4) Pain as a "sound"
(5) The Sin of Judas
(6) Redemptive Suffering
(7) Divine Mercy In
From KH @
on November 2nd, 2007 [All Souls
Day and [First Friday
As a concluding follow up to the
letter by KH published October 27th in
this Private Forum we publish the following letter from KH as well as
night, thinking I might follow God's Advice and send a wrap-up
note to my pastor, I took a look at his e-mail [see October 27th
posting] and realized that he had marked it as confidential when he
sent it to me. This was the first I had noticed it.
I have been thinking it over since then, and feel like I would have
still handled it the same way had I been aware of his conditional,
except that I would have let you know how the e-mail from him had
been marked "Confidential". I realize God DOES know everything
and doesn't make any mistakes, but when needed, He allows them -- He
even knows all the mistakes I make, as in this case.
My opinion is
that I don't have an obligation to keep his decision confidential from
either you (and the Private Forum readers) -- since The M+G+R
Foundation's writings were at the heart of the matter -- or from my
other family or friends with whom I have shared your writings.
Actually, I feel just the opposite, and if the opportunity presents, I
will explain that to the priest.
for yet another message after all the time you have already spent, but
I thought it would be right to let you know what I discovered.
May the Peace of God lighten your heart!
No mistake was really made.... your oversight was fully allowed by God
so that you could earn additional merits before His Throne.
To have shared the information that you did with m de P falls in the
category of confessional confidentiality and would not have been a
violation of the
confidentiality request of your pastor - if he had had the right to
request it, a right which he did not have.
Nonetheless - Upon receiving your initial approval, we only published
your initials and neither your city nor state were indicated. Neither
we release his name or parish; therefore, even the confidentiality he
requested - and certainly did not merit - was not violated.
Nonetheless - with all that said - given the nature of the situation you were not bound
He is passing unfair judgment on you (1)
and then he wants you to
keep quite about it? That reminds us of the technique they use
when sexually abusing parishioners. Coerce them into silence.
That shows you how ashamed of himself he is - and he certainly should
He should be "thanking his stars" - because his belief in God does not
seem to "hold much water" - that we respect the privacy of the members
of The M+G+R
Foundation's family - otherwise we would have published his full name,
parish and address and followed it with a letter to his Bishop, the
appropriate Curia members at the Vatican, with copies to the media,
asking "...if the key condition to safely
rape and plunder and
communion with "the Church" was to pretend
to be 100%
whomever occupies the Chair of Peter" regardless of whom he may be. (2)
May God continue to Bless you!
(1) Woe to you scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites; because you
go round about the sea and the land to make one proselyte; and when he
is made, you make him the child of hell twofold more than yourselves. [Matthew 23:15]
Truth About Some
Popes and About
From (Mr.) IW @ US
on November 1st, 2007 [All Saints Day]
The auto response (1)
to the e-mail I
sent within the last hour (a
reminder to read the Sequence) was attention getting.
I did re-read
the Sequence - and suspect that the new auto response is a reminder of
the imminence of these events.
All I can do is pray, continue to work
as God allows me to on what I understand to be His work for me, and to
entrust myself and those who physically depend on me to God's
protection: in this world and the
world to come.
A. Obviously the message from
Heaven is without doubt.... from Heaven.
Upon reviewing the other e-mail that you sent -
realized that you addressed it to:
[Private Address] and
firstname.lastname@example.org If memory does not
fail me, you have not, in the recent past ("recent past" could even be
"never"), written to email@example.com which is an address we
strictly use when posting comments to news reports.
Just two days ago
we set up that auto responder because we
receive much Spam to that address; Spam which comes with valid return
addresses. Thus we thought we would return their Spam with an act of
Charity and warn them of what is to come.
As a man who has "wallowed in mathematics" most of his life, I can say
probabilities of all of this "just clicking into place" unassisted by
God are slim to none.
Therefore - either you are part of my NSA Guardian Angels or they
better take note of this posting as they monitor what we publish..
(1) The auto response
in question reads:
We kindly refer you to http://www.mgr.org/sequence.html
Please take note.
From AQ @
on October 30th, 2007
Sirs in Christ,
A simple answer to my question,
would be "Yes" or "No" - but I
need to have more than this, as my problem could keep my
concentration away from God.
Would it be right for a very, very, holy Priest to throw the Blue Book of the B.V.M. into the bin.
The title of the book is: "To The Priests Our lady's Beloved Sons"
I say, all She is telling us is to
repent and Pray, Pray Pray, and then Pray some more.
The book you refer to is the "handbook" of the Marian Movement of
We are happy to have the opportunity to address this issue again.
You will find a very full answer to your question when you review our
document Regarding THE
MOVEMENT OF PRIESTS - Beyond this Document.... There Is Nothing
Can Do to Alert the Faithful Further
and our other documents
associated with it.
May now you be able to keep your concentration and attention in God -
the only worthwhile Object of mankind's total attention.
From KH @
on October 27th, 2007
As a follow up to my letter posted on October 20th and 21st on your
The meeting with the parish priest was scheduled and took place.
It seems that this pastor is uncomfortable with being forced to address
this matter because it was brought to his attention and because I have
not conceded to being "deceived." I tried to stay focused on
Jesus, and kept having to bring the discussion back to the issue at
hand. He was very chatty and all over the place with different
anecdotes. My goal was to find out the exact nature of my
violation, what would be the consequences and the process for deciding
He knows where I stand and it is now up to him as to whether or not, or
how quickly, he proceeds with reporting this matter and the results of
any decision from the diocese. I hoped that he would conduct his own
investigation of my situation, rather than just responding to pressure
from another parishioner.
He has the response you wrote (Part I
to my letter in the Private Forum.
He read it while I was there. He also has a copy of my letter to
Bishop Baker from January with the link to one of your documents.
A few days later I received the following e-mail from him:
want to refer you to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, section 837,
and that is my final word.
I feel that you have broken full
communion by your not accepting Pope Benedict Sixteenth as the
successor of St. Peter and have broken full communion with the
church. It is my earnest desire that you would repent. The
Catechism has spoken and I have no more to say, so I would hope you
have come back to full communion with Catholic Church.
To which I responded:
Thank you for
helping me through this, and because of much advice provided by you in
the past, I think I am keeping it mostly in the proper perspective--the
Eternal One. I will continue to pray about all these matters, for
you and for God's Work through you.
Thank you again for all your help and
encouragement and may God Bless you.
Your witness to the Truth - Jesus Christ - is exemplary. If
the Roman Church Administrators would have given witnessed to the Truth
just half as you have done, the world would not have fallen into the
abyss "in their watch."
Should we then not wonder why the
Roman Catholic Catechism insists that one cannot be "in communion" with
the Roman Church if one does not accept (1) an individual, Joseph Ratzinger, who claims to be
the Bishop of Rome,
the Successor of Peter, even though one lives the basic tenets of
Quite simple.... If you were satan and were planning to
present yourself as the Savior (2) - which would be the most credible "launching pad"
you would use? The Vatican (3), of course. Who would be the agent preparing his way - the anti
John the Baptizer (4)? An
individual who claims to be the Bishop of Rome, the Successor of Peter,
but who is not.
Then, logically, the Faithful must be brainwashed (5) to believe that without accepting a particular
individual who claims to be the Successor of Peter, he/she is
doomed to eternal damnation which is the equivalent of not being in
communion with the allegedly only route to Salvation.
Brethren - it is that simple. That is why hundreds of millions will be
deceived and their suffering (6) will be of apocalyptic magnitude.
What to do then when threatened with the "non in communion" veiled
threat? What would Jesus do? Exactly what He did when He
walked amongst men!
Did He not say: Do
not think that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. I am not
come to destroy, but to fulfill. [Matthew 5: 17]
He was referring, of course, to the basic tenets of the faith as had
been manifested so far - which included the teachings of the true
prophets God sent before Him.
Even though He called the Temple Masters - the equivalent of The "Pope"
of the Temple and
his Curia - every name in the book (7) and accused
them of all sorts of deviations (7) from the teachings of God, He continued to practice
His (true) Faith as had been
manifested so far until His
crucifixion - ignoring the threats of the
Spiritual deviants of the time.
You go forth and do likewise for
to you it is given to
know the mystery of the kingdom of God; but them, now like then, seeing
they cannot see, and hearing they cannot understand.!
From the Roman Catholic Church Catechism :
837 "Fully incorporated into
the society of the Church are those who, possessing the Spirit of
Christ, accept all the means of salvation given to the Church
(2) As it is
announced in the Holy Word of God - which supersedes any human teaching - The False Christ
(3) The FalseChrist Launching Pad
(4) The AntiChrist
(5) There IS Salvation outside
(6) Divine Mercy In
together with her entire
organization, and who - by the bonds constituted by the profession of
faith, the sacraments, ecclesiastical government, and communion -
are joined in the visible
structure of the Church of Christ, who rules her through the Supreme
Pontiff and the bishops. Even though incorporated into the Church,
one who does not however
persevere in charity is not saved. He remains indeed in the bosom of
the Church, but 'in body' not 'in heart.'"321
(7) Jesus Speaks Plainly
i.e. Woe to you scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites; because you
tithe mint, and anise, and cummin, and have left the weightier things
the law; judgment, and mercy, and faith. These things you ought to have
done, and not to leave those undone. [Matthew 23:23]
From IW (but of universal scope) @
on October 27th, 2007
Considering that: Prayer as reparation was NOT a part of my
catechesis/Christian formation, as a Protestant or as an Eastern
Christian. Reparation is a new idea for me; you are the one who
has introduced it to me ... even though prayer as intercession
(generically, and without reference to reparation) was a part of my
Christian life from the beginning.
1. Can I offer my
own prayers, or worship at a Sacrament, or
(involuntary) sufferings in reparation for someone else's sin, and/or
for my own?
2. Would the
While experiencing some suffering or difficulty, say silently,
"Lord Jesus, I offer this up in reparation for the sins of the world,
especially those of ___ (if I have a specific person who needs help)."
Do the same as (a) above, when
starting a prayer sequence, or
a devotion (such as the Mercy Chaplet or the Jesus Prayer) or a Church
3. Does it make
sense to pray, if I wish to offer reparations for
many people, or for the world as a whole, like this: "Lord Jesus, I
offer this ___ up in reparation for the sins of the world; apply Your
grace wherever it is most needed?"
All of the above, not only is absolutely correct and on target, needed
now more than ever.
This is amply covered in our SUFFERING
: MANKIND'S PARTICIPATION IN ITS OWN REDEMPTION - That Was Another
"Secret" From Fátima (1) document.
That is the key which is available to all alike in order to minimize
the suffering (2)
of the world as we sail through the End of These Times. Whether the
suffering is brought upon by a Tsunami (3), or a programmed
terrorist attack (4),
or uncontrollable by man fires, massive hurricanes such as Katrina (5) and, of course, a
nuclear holocaust (6),
etc. its level is in our hands.
From TJ @
on October 25th, 2007
Regarding your recent document (1)
Yes, indeed it makes sense. It also explains why as one gets
closer to God, one feels the weight of what were previously “small”
sins that much more heavily.
Because before it was not an obvious "turning away from God's grace",
since one was not really in it.
The more one is “in the grace”, the more abrupt is the pain and
realization that one has voluntarily turned away from it.
you for giving us the opportunity to call to the attention of the
Private Forum readers the effect that Divine Light has in exposing our
flaws. As we get closer to God that Light becomes brighter and we,
mercifully, can see additional areas in our soul which need attention.
The corollary to this is - of
course - the closer we get to
God the stronger the bonds of Divine love are and, the stronger those
bonds are, the more painful (2) it
is for us when we hurt the loved one.
About Men and Angels -
Their Fundamental Difference Before Their Fall
personal version of the Warning
From PP @
on October 22nd, 2007
I can't help but notice the similarities
between President Bush and
Pope Benedict. Both were/are considered to be conservative/orthodox.
However, I believe they both have fooled everyone and will usher in
just the opposite.
In Bush's case most people already realize what a
phony he is but as far as "the rottweiler of God" most people believe
he will usher in the "cleansing of the church" instead of the
continuation of cover-up and destruction.
You are quite perceptive. The confusion in the minds of most has risen
from the interchanging of the words AntiChrist and FalseChrist.
The AntiChrist is a system with an expected religious figure head (1) and a less expected
political figurehead plus lesser players (2)
; the FalseChrist
is one single individual passing himself off as the real Jesus Christ.
You have identified two key components
of the AntiChrist System (3)
must all remember that there is only one conspiracy although it may
appears as there may be several. That one conspiracy (4)
has only one
puppeteer - satan. Why? So that he may set the stage (5)
where he can then
manifest himself as the the real Jesus Christ in His Second Coming -
Meet the FalseChrist! (6)
(2) Some of the Political
Figureheads of the AntiChrist System
(3) President Bush and
Opus Dei - just one example
(4) The one conspiracy front
(5) Setting the Stage for the
manifestation of the False Christ
about the False Christ
on October 20th and 21st, 2007
must really be doing something right. I just was called into to
meet with my pastor after Mass this morning, I was presented with a
collection of your articles and asked about my "association" with this
I believe, he finally cautioned me that I'm facing being reported to
the bishop/administrator - -with whatever that entails -- as a result
of regarding as
truthful what you write.
He related your writings to the group of nuns from Hot Springs who were
just excommunicated for following some heretical teachings about the
not have much to say for myself, but since I did not acquiesce, I was
relieved of my ministerial duties and I am to "get back" to my pastor
after praying about this and "thinking it over."
I am surprised, but also not surprised, and know that it is all under
God's Authority and that He Knows Best.
I almost wish I had just said right then and there that I won't be
changing my mind, but I thought that would just make it appear that I
did not understand the gravity of the matter, so I agreed to pray it
over. I'm trying not to have a "pity party," or take it too
One funny thing is that I had already written to our (now transferred)
bishop and mentioned your work (months ago), and was never called to
the carpet about it. I have also handwritten a note to this
pastor on one of your Divine Encouragement printouts -- with full
header info -- again, with no repercussions.
It's pretty clear that it is now "someone else" working through one of
my fellow congregants who brought this whole matter to where it would
be addressed. I am praying for everyone involved.
for listening. There are very few I could share this with who
would understand as I believe you would.
Keep me in your prayers, please.
A. Part I
Thank you for allowing to
share this letter with those who have access to this new Private Forum.
We must say that this poor disoriented priest is coherent in that he
does not know what he is talking about. About the reference to
heretical nuns, according to the news report (1):
nuns are involved
with the Community of the Lady of All Nations,
better known as the Army of Mary. Catholic authorities say the Quebec,
Canada based group elevates the Virgin Mary to the level of God and
believes its founder is a reincarnation of the mother of Jesus.
Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has declared all
members of the Army of Mary heretical and automatically excommunicated
all who “knowingly” subscribed to its teachings.
Just on that note he is not even worth our - or
time in setting
the record straight. Nonetheless....
He probably thinks that sex abuse of children is a sin against customs (2)
as the Vatican pronounced; that the Successor of Peter is always
that the Church Jesus founded rests upon the "Rock" of Peter (4);
that all Jews are guilty of crucifying Jesus (5);
that the days of pre Vatican II were indeed "the good old days" (5a);
that Escriva is a saint (5b);
that Emperor Constantine donated the Roman Catholic Church the Roman
that Benedict XVI is a Pope (6);
and many other fantasies created to manipulate the masses.
What we state about the Catholic Faith (7);
the importance and great value of the Sacraments (8);
the issues that cannot be changed in the Church (9)
in spite of popular acclamation for said changes; and the demonstration
that when the Catholic Faith is applied according to the teachings of
Jesus it works against all odds (10),
and other truths will probably go right over his head. To recognize
those truths one must have real Faith and not "learned" Faith.
What can we say? He is in the majority; if he and his ilk were not,
there would have never been a need for miguel de Portugal (11)
nor for the upcoming razing of the Roman Catholic Church just as the
Second Temple and Jerusalem were razed around the year 70 AD, an event
for which the French Revolution (12) was
just a "warm up session".
Excommunication? He seems to have overlooked that Jesus is the One Who
excommunicated them (13)!
One has to be "in" to ask others to "leave".
You may be assured of our payers - but more importantly - you may be
assured that God "is in your corner".
You may share this response with that poor soul - you never know, he
may listen to Gamaliel (14)
and just wake up in time.
+by the Grace of God
Acts 5: 34-39
A. Part II [Added on
We applaud your courage and effort to do "the right thing" by
trying to give some light to that poor man. It appeared that it
backfired - but just in appearance. We cannot allow the possibility of
"backfiring" to deter us from giving others the opportunity to correct
their course before is too late. We addressed this in a
letter/response in Public Forum dated October 5th - and we quote the
Remember, give not that
which is holy
to dogs; neither cast
ye your pearls before swine, lest perhaps they trample them under their
feet, and turning upon you, they tear you. [Matthew 7:6]
Lord, I remember but I
do not trust myself - I only trust You. What if I judge someone to be a
"swine" or a "dog" and I am wrong?
Knowing the reality of Gamaliel's advice:
men of Israel,
take heed to yourselves what you intend to do, as touching these men.
36 For before these days rose up Gamaliel, affirming himself to
be somebody, to whom a number of men, about four hundred, joined
themselves: who was slain; and all that believed him were scattered,
and brought to nothing.
37 After this man, rose up Judas of Galilee, in the days of the
enrolling, and drew away the people after him: he also perished; and
all, even as many as consented to him, were dispersed.
38 And now, therefore, I say to you, refrain from these men,
and let them alone; for if this council or this work be of men, it will
come to nought;
39 But if it be of God, you cannot overthrow it, lest perhaps you be
found even to fight against God.
I rather give them a chance just in case
I erred in judgment for, if
that someone is indeed a "swine"
or a "dog", I take refuge in the truth of Gamaliel's advise and in the
fact that You promised:
....He will save me
from the fowler's snare and
the deadly pestilence. He will cover me with His feathers, and under
wings I will find refuge; His faithfulness will be my shield and
....A thousand may fall at my side, ten thousand at my right hand, but
it will not come near me. [Psalm 91]
Lord, I do not wish to "...observe with my eyes
see the punishment of the wicked." [Psalm
91] What I prefer is that those who may be deceived
by said "swine"
or "dog" see it in time so that they may break lose from their evil
spell before is too late.
From KT @
on October 17th, 2007
ONE QUESTION......... I HAVE ALWAYS
BELIEVED THAT THE END NEVER JUSTIFIES THE MEANS. YET YOU PROPOSED
THAT AN EXCEPTION BE MADE FOR THE PEOPLE OF AFRICA FOR THE USE OF
CONDOMS TO HELP PREVENT AIDS..... JUST FOR A CERTAIN LENGTH OF TIME!
THIS CONFUSES ME., HOWEVER, I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU ON THIS
MATTER AS PEOPLE ARE KILLING EACH OTHER.
THEY DO NOT HAVE "EYES TO SEE OR EARS TO HEAR." HOW CAN ONE
JUSTIFY BAD BEHAVIOR BY SAYING SOMEONE IS SICK?
HOW CAN WE FORGIVE THOSE WHO ACCEPT BAD MONEY FOR A GOOD CAUSE ,
HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN TO A NON CHRISTIAN THAT GOD ALLOWS BAD THINGS TO
HAPPEN? ACCIDENTS, VICTIMS OF CRIME?
I KNOW WELL OF FREE CHOICE BUT IT DOES NOT CONVINCE A NON-BELIEVER.
FORGIVE ME FOR ALL OF THE QUESTIONS, BUT YOU ARE MY FAMILY AND I TRUST
ALL OF YOU AS I KNOW YOU ARE DOING GOD'S WILL AND I BELIEVE IN YOU.
I WISH I HAD 3 MONTHS JUST TO SIT
AND LISTEN TO YOU.
GOD BLESS YOU FOR ALL OF YOU PATIENCE, LOVE AND
UNDERSTANDING............ ESPECIALLY OF THE WEAK ONES LIKE ME.
IN HIS NAME AND GRACE,
A. Thank your for writing and sharing
your concerns with
We also believe, and have frequently said, that the "End does not
justify the means", however, we must evaluate each individual situation
with the Light of the Holy Spirit to see how we should get from point
"A" (living outside the Law of God) to point "B" (living within the Law
The first step is to determine the "Why" of the point "A" and its
consequences - short term and long term.
We shall take first the killing of another human being as a point "A" -
this is extremely grave under any circumstances : There is no just war;
there is no just killing. Logically, point "B" is the stopping of the
killing of human beings.
Say that we have an individual who is prone to kill other humans due to
X,Y and Z reasons and does so on a regular basis. Maybe he does not
know that "Thou shalt not kill" is a real and absolute Divine Law.
Obviously he needs to be instructed in Divine Law and needs to be
assisted in his conversion - however, in the meantime, he cannot be
allowed to go around killing people until "the Evangelization" takes a
hold of his soul. He must be stopped for the benefit of others and
Now, let us take up birth control as another point "A" situation.
What is the root problem of artificial birth control? Sexual
interaction without responsibility becomes just another sport - where
one may even switch partners just as we may do for a tennis
match. The more uneducated the individual is and the less means
of entertainment he/she may have, the more he/she will turn to sex
and/or drugs as an "entertaining sport". The more bored a rich
and well educated individual gets, the more he/she will also turn to
sex and/or drugs as an "entertaining sport".
Promiscuous sex and the use of drugs are the two societal maladies
which can harm a soul the most. Thus, logically God has allowed
AIDS. He is more interested in our soul within the overall Eternal
picture, than just the brief time it resides in a body on Earth. If
some activity is going to gravely harm the soul - He rather take them
home soon. (1)
In the birth control situation - We could then take two positions: (a)
Let them destroy themselves and thus "help God"; or (b) Intervene and
help them find the way to God in a more natural way.
If we take position (a), it would logically follows, to the derange
minds, that all sick and poor people should be exterminated.... and
"...by doing this we are doing them a favor and serving God along."
(believe it or not, that thinking is "on the table" of the Future
Masters of the world.)
If we take position (b), we assist them in not killing each other,
through unprotected sexual intercourse, by providing them with the
appropriate protection WHILE simultaneously
Evangelizing them so that they will abandon the "Outside the Laws of
God" lifestyle, i.e. "Sexual activity is a sport."
In certain countries of Europe they established a "Clean Syringe
Program" wherein the drug addicts would turn in their used syringes and
get clean ones in ordered to arrest the spread of AIDS through sharing
infected syringes. This was done WITHOUT any Evangelization, therefore,
what on the surface looked like a very charitable act was indeed
contributing to the further degradation of their souls.
This would be the same if we just pass out condoms and do nothing else.
(a) Passing out
prevent the spread of AIDS via sexual intercourse - and do nothing else - to
save lives cannot be considered as a "means justified by the end" -
because we are working against God by helping in the destruction of
(b) Passing out condoms to prevent the spread of AIDS via sexual
intercourse - and implement
a solid Evangelization program to change the mentality of the
individuals through Light and Grace - is a method of "buying
time" while the leaven of the kingdom of heaven works its wonders in
their souls - thus we are cooperating with God' plan for His children. [The kingdom of heaven is like to leaven,
which a woman took and hid in three measures of meal, until the whole
was leavened. [Matthew 13:33]]
thinking could degenerate into a philosophical discussion about the
difference or equivalence of murdering/killing with a gun, for example,
and killing with an AIDS contaminated sexual liaison. However, we must
keep in mind that: Death by gunshot is quick and little can be done to
draw the soul to God before separation of soul and body. Death through
AIDS is slow and much can be done to draw that soul to God before its
separation. Therefore - we cannot compare, nor treat alike, both
methods of killing a body.
Your other questions have been answered in different documents in our
Regarding what "does not convince a non believer" is completely outside
the responsibility of the Elect. We are to take a horse to water, drink
of it so that the horse sees that it quenches our thirst with no
ill effects; then, if the horse still refuses to drink, we must allow
the horse to die of thirst. The Elect never were nor will ever be
part of the Inquisition crowd. Their technique would have been
"choking the horse to death" while force feeding him water to "keep him
Yes, that is how ridiculous and pathetic the alleged Evangelization has
been in the last ca. 1600 years.... and stay tuned, as we have already
explained, it will be tried again. (3)
near Apocalyptic Climatic and
Geological Events Worldwide
(2) Pain is the
megaphone.... , Divine Mercy in Action - Part
I and Part
striking similarity of the French Revolution with the activities
"scheduled" for End of These Times
Copyright 2007 - 2014 by
Foundation. All rights reserved.
BOARD Listing of Past Updates
to this Domain
PAGE - English
PAGE - Español
PAGE - Portugues
If the above dated
does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the
original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to view
If you wish to contact The M+G+R
please Click Here
You may freely reproduce and
this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as to its
(2) No changes are made in the text without prior written consent; and
(3) No charge is made for it.